T400 4 GB vs GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile with T400 4 GB, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2070 Mobile
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 115 Watt
33.81
+253%

RTX 2070 Mobile outperforms T400 4 GB by a whopping 253% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking153464
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency20.6522.45
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTU106BTU117
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date29 January 2019 (6 years ago)6 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304384
Core clock speed1305 MHz420 MHz
Boost clock speed1485 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate213.834.20
Floating-point processing power6.843 TFLOPS1.094 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs14424
Tensor Cores288no data
Ray Tracing Cores36no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs3x mini-DisplayPort
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA7.57.5
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD123
+310%
30−35
−310%
1440p80
+281%
21−24
−281%
4K50
+257%
14−16
−257%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 90−95
+292%
24−27
−292%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+289%
18−20
−289%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+306%
18−20
−306%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 90−95
+292%
24−27
−292%
Battlefield 5 120
+300%
30−33
−300%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+289%
18−20
−289%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+306%
18−20
−306%
Far Cry 5 122
+307%
30−33
−307%
Fortnite 188
+276%
50−55
−276%
Forza Horizon 4 113
+277%
30−33
−277%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
+292%
24−27
−292%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 196
+256%
55−60
−256%
Valorant 234
+260%
65−70
−260%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 90−95
+292%
24−27
−292%
Battlefield 5 134
+283%
35−40
−283%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+289%
18−20
−289%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+268%
75−80
−268%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+306%
18−20
−306%
Dota 2 124
+254%
35−40
−254%
Far Cry 5 113
+277%
30−33
−277%
Fortnite 149
+273%
40−45
−273%
Forza Horizon 4 112
+273%
30−33
−273%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
+292%
24−27
−292%
Grand Theft Auto V 115
+283%
30−33
−283%
Metro Exodus 69
+283%
18−20
−283%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 173
+284%
45−50
−284%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 142
+255%
40−45
−255%
Valorant 230
+254%
65−70
−254%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 121
+303%
30−33
−303%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+289%
18−20
−289%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+306%
18−20
−306%
Dota 2 117
+290%
30−33
−290%
Far Cry 5 106
+253%
30−33
−253%
Forza Horizon 4 94
+292%
24−27
−292%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
+292%
24−27
−292%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130
+271%
35−40
−271%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74
+311%
18−20
−311%
Valorant 154
+285%
40−45
−285%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 141
+303%
35−40
−303%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+270%
60−65
−270%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+294%
16−18
−294%
Metro Exodus 42
+320%
10−11
−320%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+289%
45−50
−289%
Valorant 229
+282%
60−65
−282%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 92
+283%
24−27
−283%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+286%
7−8
−286%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+289%
9−10
−289%
Far Cry 5 76
+262%
21−24
−262%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+267%
24−27
−267%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+256%
16−18
−256%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+256%
16−18
−256%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 94
+292%
24−27
−292%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+271%
7−8
−271%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+261%
18−20
−261%
Metro Exodus 26
+271%
7−8
−271%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
+257%
14−16
−257%
Valorant 202
+267%
55−60
−267%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 52
+271%
14−16
−271%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Dota 2 95−100
+263%
27−30
−263%
Far Cry 5 40
+300%
10−11
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+263%
16−18
−263%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+267%
9−10
−267%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 46
+283%
12−14
−283%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 46
+283%
12−14
−283%

This is how RTX 2070 Mobile and T400 4 GB compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 Mobile is 310% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2070 Mobile is 281% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2070 Mobile is 257% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.81 9.59
Recency 29 January 2019 6 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 30 Watt

RTX 2070 Mobile has a 252.6% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

T400 4 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 283.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the T400 4 GB in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile is a notebook card while T400 4 GB is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2070
NVIDIA T400 4 GB
T400 4 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 499 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 61 vote

Rate T400 4 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile or T400 4 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.