Radeon Pro 555X vs GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile with Radeon Pro 555X, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2070 Mobile
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 115 Watt
33.34
+312%

RTX 2070 Mobile outperforms Pro 555X by a whopping 312% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking149507
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency20.757.73
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameTU106BPolaris 21
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date29 January 2019 (6 years ago)16 July 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304768
Core clock speed1305 MHz907 MHz
Boost clock speed1485 MHzno data
Number of transistors10,800 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate213.843.54
Floating-point processing power6.843 TFLOPS1.393 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs14448
Tensor Cores288no data
Ray Tracing Cores36no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1275 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s81.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+
VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.5-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD120
+344%
27−30
−344%
1440p75
+317%
18−20
−317%
4K48
+380%
10−12
−380%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+312%
16−18
−312%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+329%
16−18
−329%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 95
+252%
27−30
−252%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+312%
16−18
−312%
Cyberpunk 2077 38
+124%
16−18
−124%
Forza Horizon 4 183
+438%
30−35
−438%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
+350%
20−22
−350%
Metro Exodus 94
+327%
21−24
−327%
Red Dead Redemption 2 106
+361%
21−24
−361%
Valorant 170
+448%
30−35
−448%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 135
+400%
27−30
−400%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+312%
16−18
−312%
Cyberpunk 2077 31
+82.4%
16−18
−82.4%
Dota 2 118
+293%
30−33
−293%
Far Cry 5 79
+119%
35−40
−119%
Fortnite 150−160
+216%
50−55
−216%
Forza Horizon 4 149
+338%
30−35
−338%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
+350%
20−22
−350%
Grand Theft Auto V 115
+283%
30−33
−283%
Metro Exodus 73
+232%
21−24
−232%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 248
+270%
65−70
−270%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55
+139%
21−24
−139%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+362%
24−27
−362%
Valorant 102
+229%
30−35
−229%
World of Tanks 270−280
+121%
120−130
−121%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 83
+207%
27−30
−207%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+312%
16−18
−312%
Cyberpunk 2077 26
+52.9%
16−18
−52.9%
Dota 2 117
+290%
30−33
−290%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+156%
35−40
−156%
Forza Horizon 4 125
+268%
30−35
−268%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
+350%
20−22
−350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 104
+55.2%
65−70
−55.2%
Valorant 154
+397%
30−35
−397%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 60−65
+530%
10−11
−530%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+473%
10−12
−473%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+317%
40−45
−317%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35
+400%
7−8
−400%
World of Tanks 220−230
+264%
60−65
−264%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 72
+380%
14−16
−380%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+314%
7−8
−314%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
+143%
7−8
−143%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+517%
18−20
−517%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+439%
18−20
−439%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+375%
12−14
−375%
Metro Exodus 74
+429%
14−16
−429%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+418%
10−12
−418%
Valorant 104
+395%
21−24
−395%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+76.9%
12−14
−76.9%
Dota 2 65−70
+242%
18−20
−242%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+247%
18−20
−247%
Metro Exodus 26
+550%
4−5
−550%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 118
+392%
24−27
−392%
Red Dead Redemption 2 23
+360%
5−6
−360%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+242%
18−20
−242%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 38
+443%
7−8
−443%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+76.9%
12−14
−76.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 8
+167%
3−4
−167%
Dota 2 65−70
+242%
18−20
−242%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+390%
10−11
−390%
Fortnite 48
+500%
8−9
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+460%
10−11
−460%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+417%
6−7
−417%
Valorant 55
+588%
8−9
−588%

This is how RTX 2070 Mobile and Pro 555X compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 Mobile is 344% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2070 Mobile is 317% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2070 Mobile is 380% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 2070 Mobile is 588% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 2070 Mobile surpassed Pro 555X in all 64 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.34 8.10
Recency 29 January 2019 16 July 2018
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 75 Watt

RTX 2070 Mobile has a 311.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

Pro 555X, on the other hand, has 53.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 555X in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 555X is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
AMD Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 495 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 171 vote

Rate Radeon Pro 555X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.