Quadro M5000 vs GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile

Place in the ranking	149	230
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	3.09
Power efficiency	20.67	11.12
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code name	TU106B	GM204
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	29 January 2019 (5 years ago)	29 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$2,856.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	2048
Core clock speed	1305 MHz	861 MHz
Boost clock speed	1485 MHz	1038 MHz
Number of transistors	10,800 million	5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	115 Watt	150 Watt
Texture fill rate	213.8	132.9
Floating-point processing power	6.843 TFLOPS	4.252 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	144	128
Tensor Cores	288	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	36	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2" (5.1 cm)
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1 x 6-pin
SLI options	-	+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	256 Bit
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	1653 MHz
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	Up to 211 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort
Number of simultaneous displays	no data	4
Multi-display synchronization	no data	Quadro Sync
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)	no data	+
3D Vision Pro	no data	+
Mosaic	no data	+
High-Performance Video I/O6	no data	+
VR Ready	+	no data
nView Desktop Management	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12
Shader Model	6.5	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA	7.5	5.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	121 +51.3%	80−85 −51.3%
1440p	77 +54%	50−55 −54%
4K	44 +46.7%	30−35 −46.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	35.71
1440p	no data	57.14
4K	no data	95.23

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

50−55
+54.3%

35−40

−54.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	100 +42.9%	70−75 −42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	81 +47.3%	55−60 −47.3%
Battlefield 5	142 +49.5%	95−100 −49.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	106 +51.4%	70−75 −51.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +54.3%	35−40 −54.3%
Far Cry 5	125 +47.1%	85−90 −47.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	127 +49.4%	85−90 −49.4%
Forza Horizon 4	382 +46.9%	260−270 −46.9%
Hitman 3	100 +42.9%	70−75 −42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	234 +46.3%	160−170 −46.3%
Metro Exodus	143 +43%	100−105 −43%
Red Dead Redemption 2	106 +51.4%	70−75 −51.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	186 +43.1%	130−140 −43.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	223 +48.7%	150−160 −48.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	112 +49.3%	75−80 −49.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	69 +53.3%	45−50 −53.3%
Battlefield 5	127 +49.4%	85−90 −49.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	94 +44.6%	65−70 −44.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +54.3%	35−40 −54.3%
Far Cry 5	97 +49.2%	65−70 −49.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	93 +43.1%	65−70 −43.1%
Forza Horizon 4	287 +43.5%	200−210 −43.5%
Hitman 3	96 +47.7%	65−70 −47.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	230 +43.8%	160−170 −43.8%
Metro Exodus	130 +44.4%	90−95 −44.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	86 +43.3%	60−65 −43.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	149 +49%	100−105 −49%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	200 +42.9%	140−150 −42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	211 +50.7%	140−150 −50.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	58 +45%	40−45 −45%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	59 +47.5%	40−45 −47.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	69 +53.3%	45−50 −53.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +54.3%	35−40 −54.3%
Far Cry 5	73 +46%	50−55 −46%
Forza Horizon 4	94 +44.6%	65−70 −44.6%
Hitman 3	80 +45.5%	55−60 −45.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	114 +52%	75−80 −52%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	125 +47.1%	85−90 −47.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	74 +48%	50−55 −48%
Watch Dogs: Legion	56 +60%	35−40 −60%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

92
+53.3%

60−65

−53.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	78 +56%	50−55 −56%
Far Cry New Dawn	64 +60%	40−45 −60%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	48 +60%	30−33 −60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	47 +56.7%	30−33 −56.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	52 +48.6%	35−40 −48.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +43.8%	16−18 −43.8%
Far Cry 5	52 +48.6%	35−40 −48.6%
Forza Horizon 4	277 +45.8%	190−200 −45.8%
Hitman 3	56 +60%	35−40 −60%
Horizon Zero Dawn	87 +45%	60−65 −45%
Metro Exodus	74 +48%	50−55 −48%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	70−75 +48%	50−55 −48%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +43.3%	30−33 −43.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	206 +47.1%	140−150 −47.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

73
+46%

50−55

−46%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	39 +44.4%	27−30 −44.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	36 +50%	24−27 −50%
Hitman 3	36 +50%	24−27 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	101 +44.3%	70−75 −44.3%
Metro Exodus	45 +50%	30−33 −50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50 +42.9%	35−40 −42.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	31 +47.6%	21−24 −47.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	28 +55.6%	18−20 −55.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	29 +61.1%	18−20 −61.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Far Cry 5	26 +44.4%	18−20 −44.4%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +46.7%	30−33 −46.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +55.6%	27−30 −55.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	23 +43.8%	16−18 −43.8%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

37
+54.2%

24−27

−54.2%

This is how RTX 2070 Mobile and Quadro M5000 compete in popular games:

RTX 2070 Mobile is 51% faster in 1080p
RTX 2070 Mobile is 54% faster in 1440p
RTX 2070 Mobile is 47% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	34.64	24.30
Recency	29 January 2019	29 June 2015
Chip lithography	12 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	115 Watt	150 Watt

RTX 2070 Mobile has a 42.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 30.4% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M5000 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile is a notebook card while Quadro M5000 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.