FireStream 9250 vs GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile

Place in performance ranking	161	736
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	11.35	no data
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code name	N18E-G2 TU106	RV770
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	6 January 2019 (5 years ago)	16 June 2008 (16 years ago)
Current price	$1758	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	800
Core clock speed	1215 MHz	625 MHz
Boost clock speed	1440 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	10,800 million	956 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	115 Watt	150 Watt
Texture fill rate	213.8	25.00
Floating-point performance	no data	1,000.0 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile and FireStream 9250 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	1986 MHz
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	63.55 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI
G-SYNC support	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model	6.5	4.1
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	7.5	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2070 Mobile 31.99
+963%

FireStream 9250 3.01

GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile outperforms FireStream 9250 by 963% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 2070 Mobile 12354
+961%

FireStream 9250 1164

GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile outperforms FireStream 9250 by 961% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	122 +1120%	10−12 −1120%
1440p	73 +1117%	6−7 −1117%
4K	48 +1100%	4−5 −1100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

50−55
+980%

5−6

−980%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	100 +1011%	9−10 −1011%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	81 +1057%	7−8 −1057%
Battlefield 5	142 +1083%	12−14 −1083%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	106 +1078%	9−10 −1078%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +980%	5−6 −980%
Far Cry 5	125 +1150%	10−11 −1150%
Far Cry New Dawn	127 +1170%	10−11 −1170%
Forza Horizon 4	113 +1030%	10−11 −1030%
Hitman 3	100 +1011%	9−10 −1011%
Horizon Zero Dawn	166 +1086%	14−16 −1086%
Metro Exodus	143 +1092%	12−14 −1092%
Red Dead Redemption 2	106 +1078%	9−10 −1078%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	183 +1044%	16−18 −1044%
Watch Dogs: Legion	93 +1063%	8−9 −1063%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	84 +1100%	7−8 −1100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	69 +1050%	6−7 −1050%
Battlefield 5	127 +1170%	10−11 −1170%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	94 +1075%	8−9 −1075%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +980%	5−6 −980%
Far Cry 5	97 +978%	9−10 −978%
Far Cry New Dawn	93 +1063%	8−9 −1063%
Forza Horizon 4	287 +963%	27−30 −963%
Hitman 3	81 +1057%	7−8 −1057%
Horizon Zero Dawn	230 +995%	21−24 −995%
Metro Exodus	110 +1000%	10−11 −1000%
Red Dead Redemption 2	95 +1088%	8−9 −1088%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	149 +964%	14−16 −964%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	142 +1083%	12−14 −1083%
Watch Dogs: Legion	211 +1072%	18−20 −1072%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	58 +1060%	5−6 −1060%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	59 +1080%	5−6 −1080%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	69 +1050%	6−7 −1050%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +980%	5−6 −980%
Far Cry 5	73 +1117%	6−7 −1117%
Forza Horizon 4	94 +1075%	8−9 −1075%
Horizon Zero Dawn	114 +1040%	10−11 −1040%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	125 +1150%	10−11 −1150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	74 +1133%	6−7 −1133%
Watch Dogs: Legion	56 +1020%	5−6 −1020%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

92
+1050%

8−9

−1050%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	78 +1014%	7−8 −1014%
Far Cry New Dawn	88 +1000%	8−9 −1000%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	48 +1100%	4−5 −1100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	47 +1075%	4−5 −1075%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	66 +1000%	6−7 −1000%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +1050%	2−3 −1050%
Far Cry 5	76 +986%	7−8 −986%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +983%	6−7 −983%
Hitman 3	56 +1020%	5−6 −1020%
Horizon Zero Dawn	87 +988%	8−9 −988%
Metro Exodus	74 +1133%	6−7 −1133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	70−75 +1133%	6−7 −1133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +975%	4−5 −975%
Watch Dogs: Legion	42 +1300%	3−4 −1300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

73
+1117%

6−7

−1117%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	39 +1200%	3−4 −1200%
Far Cry New Dawn	36 +1100%	3−4 −1100%
Hitman 3	36 +1100%	3−4 −1100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +1200%	3−4 −1200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	33 +1000%	3−4 −1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50 +1150%	4−5 −1150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	31 +1450%	2−3 −1450%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	28 +1300%	2−3 −1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	29 +1350%	2−3 −1350%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10	0−1
Far Cry 5	26 +1200%	2−3 −1200%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +1000%	4−5 −1000%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50 +1150%	4−5 −1150%
Metro Exodus	42 +1300%	3−4 −1300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	23 +1050%	2−3 −1050%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

37
+1133%

3−4

−1133%

This is how RTX 2070 Mobile and FireStream 9250 compete in popular games:

RTX 2070 Mobile is 1120% faster in 1080p
RTX 2070 Mobile is 1117% faster in 1440p
RTX 2070 Mobile is 1100% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	31.99	3.01
Recency	6 January 2019	16 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	1 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	115 Watt	150 Watt