Radeon RX 7600M XT vs GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q and Radeon RX 7600M XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
2020
8 GB GDDR6, 80 Watt
35.50
+2.7%

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q outperforms RX 7600M XT by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking142149
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency30.6219.87
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTU104Navi 33
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date2 April 2020 (4 years ago)4 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25602048
Core clock speed930 MHz1280 MHz
Boost clock speed1155 MHz2469 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate184.8316.0
Floating-point processing power5.914 TFLOPS20.23 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs160128
Tensor Cores320no data
Ray Tracing Cores4032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth352.0 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.2.1401.3
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q 35.50
+2.7%
RX 7600M XT 34.55

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q 13650
+2.7%
RX 7600M XT 13286

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q 27724
RX 7600M XT 38039
+37.2%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q 65101
RX 7600M XT 94691
+45.5%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q 20873
RX 7600M XT 28686
+37.4%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q 126747
RX 7600M XT 155836
+23%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q 461648
+1.7%
RX 7600M XT 453957

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q 7374
RX 7600M XT 9555
+29.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD104
−11.5%
116
+11.5%
1440p70
+27.3%
55
−27.3%
4K49
+48.5%
33
−48.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
−45.8%
105
+45.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+2.7%
70−75
−2.7%
Elden Ring 120−130
−9.8%
135
+9.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 89
−9%
95−100
+9%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
−25%
90
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
−115%
70−75
+115%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
−51.8%
255
+51.8%
Metro Exodus 98
−11.2%
109
+11.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 109
+55.7%
70−75
−55.7%
Valorant 157
+13.8%
130−140
−13.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+1%
95−100
−1%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
−13.9%
82
+13.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 28
−161%
70−75
+161%
Dota 2 128
+43.8%
89
−43.8%
Elden Ring 120−130
+3.4%
110−120
−3.4%
Far Cry 5 88
+25.7%
70
−25.7%
Fortnite 160−170
+1.9%
150−160
−1.9%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
−23.8%
208
+23.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 125
−5.6%
132
+5.6%
Metro Exodus 80
−12.5%
90
+12.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200
+1.1%
190−200
−1.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 51
−37.3%
70−75
+37.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+3.4%
110−120
−3.4%
Valorant 94
−46.8%
130−140
+46.8%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0.4%
270−280
−0.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80
−21.3%
95−100
+21.3%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+20%
60
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 24
−204%
70−75
+204%
Dota 2 127
+13.4%
110−120
−13.4%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+2.2%
90−95
−2.2%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
−7.1%
180
+7.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200
+1.1%
190−200
−1.1%
Valorant 136
−1.5%
130−140
+1.5%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 60−65
−9.4%
70
+9.4%
Elden Ring 70−75
+4.5%
65−70
−4.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
−6.2%
69
+6.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 33
+0%
30−35
+0%
World of Tanks 220−230
+2.3%
220−230
−2.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 76
+15.2%
65−70
−15.2%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+3%
30−35
−3%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+3%
30−35
−3%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+2.7%
110−120
−2.7%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
−20%
120
+20%
Metro Exodus 75
−22.7%
92
+22.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−25.4%
74
+25.4%
Valorant 100
−3%
100−110
+3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+3500%
1
−3500%
Dota 2 73
−1.4%
74
+1.4%
Elden Ring 30−35
+6.5%
30−35
−6.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 73
−1.4%
74
+1.4%
Metro Exodus 28
−25%
35
+25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+2.7%
110−120
−2.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21
−4.8%
21−24
+4.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 73
−1.4%
74
+1.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 42
+7.7%
35−40
−7.7%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+177%
13
−177%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Dota 2 103
+58.5%
65−70
−58.5%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+4.1%
45−50
−4.1%
Fortnite 45−50
+4.3%
45−50
−4.3%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−10.3%
64
+10.3%
Valorant 51
−3.9%
50−55
+3.9%

This is how RTX 2070 Super Max-Q and RX 7600M XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7600M XT is 12% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is 27% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is 48% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is 3500% faster.
  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7600M XT is 204% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is ahead in 30 tests (48%)
  • RX 7600M XT is ahead in 31 test (49%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.50 34.55
Recency 2 April 2020 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 120 Watt

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q has a 2.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% lower power consumption.

RX 7600M XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q and Radeon RX 7600M XT.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT
Radeon RX 7600M XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 504 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 75 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.