RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q with RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2070 Max-Q
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 80 Watt
30.17

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms RTX 2070 Max-Q by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking187111
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency25.8523.64
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTU106Bno data
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date29 January 2019 (5 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23043072
Core clock speed885 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1185 MHzno data
Number of transistors10,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate170.6no data
Floating-point processing power5.46 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs144no data
Tensor Cores288no data
Ray Tracing Cores36no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2070 Max-Q 30.17
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 39.65
+31.4%

  • Other tests
    • Passmark
    • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
    • 3DMark Vantage Performance
    • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
    • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
    • 3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2070 Max-Q 11630
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 15285
+31.4%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 2070 Max-Q 22089
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 28910
+30.9%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 2070 Max-Q 48510
+28.2%
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 37844

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 2070 Max-Q 17335
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 21379
+23.3%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 2070 Max-Q 106564
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 115230
+8.1%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RTX 2070 Max-Q 6661
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 8095
+21.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100
−30%
130−140
+30%
1440p59
−27.1%
75−80
+27.1%
4K37
−21.6%
45−50
+21.6%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−27.5%
65−70
+27.5%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 71
−26.8%
90−95
+26.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 73
−30.1%
95−100
+30.1%
Battlefield 5 110
−27.3%
140−150
+27.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
−29%
80−85
+29%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−27.5%
65−70
+27.5%
Far Cry 5 85
−29.4%
110−120
+29.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 113
−23.9%
140−150
+23.9%
Forza Horizon 4 204
−27.5%
260−270
+27.5%
Hitman 3 81
−23.5%
100−105
+23.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
−26.9%
170−180
+26.9%
Metro Exodus 143
−25.9%
180−190
+25.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
−25%
95−100
+25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 148
−28.4%
190−200
+28.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
−22.8%
140−150
+22.8%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 118
−27.1%
150−160
+27.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 61
−31.1%
80−85
+31.1%
Battlefield 5 100
−30%
130−140
+30%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 74
−28.4%
95−100
+28.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−27.5%
65−70
+27.5%
Far Cry 5 68
−25%
85−90
+25%
Far Cry New Dawn 77
−29.9%
100−105
+29.9%
Forza Horizon 4 191
−30.9%
250−260
+30.9%
Hitman 3 81
−23.5%
100−105
+23.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
−26.9%
170−180
+26.9%
Metro Exodus 120
−25%
150−160
+25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85
−29.4%
110−120
+29.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−110
−22.6%
130−140
+22.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
−25%
80−85
+25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
−22.8%
140−150
+22.8%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50
−30%
65−70
+30%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 54
−29.6%
70−75
+29.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 57
−22.8%
70−75
+22.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−27.5%
65−70
+27.5%
Far Cry 5 52
−25%
65−70
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 98
−22.4%
120−130
+22.4%
Hitman 3 72
−25%
90−95
+25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 105
−23.8%
130−140
+23.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−110
−22.6%
130−140
+22.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 64
−25%
80−85
+25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 51
−27.5%
65−70
+27.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 84
−31%
110−120
+31%
Battlefield 5 61
−31.1%
80−85
+31.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 50
−30%
65−70
+30%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 33
−21.2%
40−45
+21.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
−29%
40−45
+29%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−28.6%
45−50
+28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%
Far Cry 5 36
−25%
45−50
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 176
−30.7%
230−240
+30.7%
Hitman 3 35−40
−21.6%
45−50
+21.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80
−25%
100−105
+25%
Metro Exodus 72
−25%
90−95
+25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
−30.4%
90−95
+30.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−25%
50−55
+25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 160−170
−28.8%
210−220
+28.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−27.5%
65−70
+27.5%
Battlefield 5 30
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 28
−25%
35−40
+25%
Hitman 3 24−27
−25%
30−33
+25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
−25.8%
190−200
+25.8%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−25%
45−50
+25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45
−22.2%
55−60
+22.2%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20
−20%
24−27
+20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Far Cry 5 20
−20%
24−27
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−31%
55−60
+31%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−28.2%
50−55
+28.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−15.4%
30−33
+15.4%

This is how RTX 2070 Max-Q and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is 30% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is 27% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is 22% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.17 39.65
Recency 29 January 2019 21 March 2023
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 115 Watt

RTX 2070 Max-Q has 43.8% lower power consumption.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 31.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q is a notebook graphics card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2
348 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3
19 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.