Radeon Pro W6600M vs GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile

Place in the ranking	184	223
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	18.12	18.81
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	TU106	Navi 23
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	29 January 2019 (5 years ago)	8 June 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1920	1792
Core clock speed	960 MHz	1224 MHz
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz	2034 MHz
Number of transistors	10,800 million	11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	115 Watt	90 Watt
Texture fill rate	144.0	227.8
Floating-point processing power	4.608 TFLOPS	7.29 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	64
TMUs	120	112
Tensor Cores	240	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	30	28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	336.0 GB/s	224.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	Portable Device Dependent
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	7.5	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	104 +30%	80−85 −30%
1440p	67 +34%	50−55 −34%
4K	38 +26.7%	30−35 −26.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

45−50

−22.4%

60−65
+22.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	91 +21.3%	75−80 −21.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	71 +18.3%	60−65 −18.3%
Battlefield 5	119 +4.4%	110−120 −4.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	88 +23.9%	70−75 −23.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 −22.4%	60−65 +22.4%
Far Cry 5	105 +34.6%	75−80 −34.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	110 +25%	85−90 −25%
Forza Horizon 4	366 +102%	180−190 −102%
Hitman 3	83 +12.2%	70−75 −12.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	223 +48.7%	150−160 −48.7%
Metro Exodus	130 +12.1%	110−120 −12.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	100 +17.6%	85−90 −17.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	148 +17.5%	120−130 −17.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	227 +86.1%	120−130 −86.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	107 +42.7%	75−80 −42.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	56 −7.1%	60−65 +7.1%
Battlefield 5	105 −8.6%	110−120 +8.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	79 +11.3%	70−75 −11.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 −22.4%	60−65 +22.4%
Far Cry 5	85 +9%	75−80 −9%
Far Cry New Dawn	82 −7.3%	85−90 +7.3%
Forza Horizon 4	280 +54.7%	180−190 −54.7%
Hitman 3	75 +1.4%	70−75 −1.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	196 +30.7%	150−160 −30.7%
Metro Exodus	112 −3.6%	110−120 +3.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	75 −13.3%	85−90 +13.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	123 −2.4%	120−130 +2.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 −17.7%	70−75 +17.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	190 +55.7%	120−130 −55.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50 −50%	75−80 +50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	48 −25%	60−65 +25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	58 −22.4%	70−75 +22.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 −22.4%	60−65 +22.4%
Far Cry 5	62 −25.8%	75−80 +25.8%
Forza Horizon 4	88 −106%	180−190 +106%
Hitman 3	66 −12.1%	70−75 +12.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	94 −59.6%	150−160 +59.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	107 −17.8%	120−130 +17.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60 −21.7%	70−75 +21.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	38 −221%	120−130 +221%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

−7.6%

85−90
+7.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	65 −3.1%	65−70 +3.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	54 +0%	50−55 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40 +5.3%	35−40 −5.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	38 +0%	35−40 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	42 +2.4%	40−45 −2.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	20−22 −30%	24−27 +30%
Far Cry 5	42 +2.4%	40−45 −2.4%
Forza Horizon 4	246 +23%	200−210 −23%
Hitman 3	46 +4.5%	40−45 −4.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70 −7.1%	75−80 +7.1%
Metro Exodus	55−60 −17.9%	65−70 +17.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 −23.9%	80−85 +23.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −28.9%	45−50 +28.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	210 +17.3%	170−180 −17.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

62
+3.3%

60−65

−3.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	32 −9.4%	35−40 +9.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	30 +3.4%	27−30 −3.4%
Hitman 3	28 +0%	27−30 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	86 −96.5%	160−170 +96.5%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −22.9%	40−45 +22.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	39 −5.1%	40−45 +5.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	25 +8.7%	21−24 −8.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	22 +4.8%	21−24 −4.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20 −10%	21−24 +10%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −37.5%	10−12 +37.5%
Far Cry 5	21 +5%	20−22 −5%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −20%	45−50 +20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −23.7%	45−50 +23.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	15 −13.3%	16−18 +13.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

−3.3%

30−35
+3.3%

This is how RTX 2060 Mobile and Pro W6600M compete in popular games:

RTX 2060 Mobile is 30% faster in 1080p
RTX 2060 Mobile is 34% faster in 1440p
RTX 2060 Mobile is 27% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 2060 Mobile is 102% faster.
in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro W6600M is 221% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 2060 Mobile is ahead in 31 test (43%)
Pro W6600M is ahead in 38 tests (53%)
there's a draw in 3 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	30.41	24.71
Recency	29 January 2019	8 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	115 Watt	90 Watt

RTX 2060 Mobile has a 23.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Pro W6600M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 71.4% more advanced lithography process, and 27.8% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro W6600M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro W6600M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.