Radeon Pro W6600M vs GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile with Radeon Pro W6600M, including specs and performance data.
RTX 2080 Super Mobile outperforms Pro W6600M by a substantial 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 146 | 238 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 18.83 | 23.34 |
| Architecture | Turing (2018−2022) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) |
| GPU code name | TU104 | Navi 23 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 2 April 2020 (6 years ago) | 8 June 2021 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3072 | 1792 |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz | 1224 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 2034 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 13,600 million | 11,060 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 90 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 299.5 | 227.8 |
| Floating-point processing power | 9.585 TFLOPS | 7.29 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 192 | 112 |
| Tensor Cores | 384 | no data |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | 28 |
| L0 Cache | no data | 448 KB |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 Cache | no data | 32 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 224.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
| G-SYNC support | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| VR Ready | + | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.140 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | - |
| DLSS | + | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 137
+37%
| 100−110
−37%
|
| 1440p | 95
+35.7%
| 70−75
−35.7%
|
| 4K | 65
+44.4%
| 45−50
−44.4%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 200−210
+31.8%
|
150−160
−31.8%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 85−90
+38.7%
|
60−65
−38.7%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 95−100
+45.6%
|
65−70
−45.6%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 169
+59.4%
|
100−110
−59.4%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 200−210
+31.8%
|
150−160
−31.8%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 85−90
+38.7%
|
60−65
−38.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 110−120
+32.2%
|
90−95
−32.2%
|
| Fortnite | 178
+35.9%
|
130−140
−35.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 140−150
+32.1%
|
100−110
−32.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 110−120
+34.1%
|
85−90
−34.1%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 140−150
+33.3%
|
110−120
−33.3%
|
| Valorant | 220−230
+20.9%
|
180−190
−20.9%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 161
+51.9%
|
100−110
−51.9%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 200−210
+31.8%
|
150−160
−31.8%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 270−280
+3.3%
|
270−280
−3.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 85−90
+38.7%
|
60−65
−38.7%
|
| Dota 2 | 153
+17.7%
|
130−140
−17.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 110−120
+32.2%
|
90−95
−32.2%
|
| Fortnite | 171
+30.5%
|
130−140
−30.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 140−150
+32.1%
|
100−110
−32.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 110−120
+34.1%
|
85−90
−34.1%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 136
+37.4%
|
95−100
−37.4%
|
| Metro Exodus | 92
+46%
|
60−65
−46%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 140−150
+33.3%
|
110−120
−33.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 198
+128%
|
85−90
−128%
|
| Valorant | 220−230
+20.9%
|
180−190
−20.9%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 147
+38.7%
|
100−110
−38.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 85−90
+38.7%
|
60−65
−38.7%
|
| Dota 2 | 141
+8.5%
|
130−140
−8.5%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 110−120
+32.2%
|
90−95
−32.2%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 140−150
+32.1%
|
100−110
−32.1%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 140−150
+33.3%
|
110−120
−33.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 103
+18.4%
|
85−90
−18.4%
|
| Valorant | 205
+12.6%
|
180−190
−12.6%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 136
+3.8%
|
130−140
−3.8%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 90−95
+48.4%
|
60−65
−48.4%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 260−270
+33.2%
|
190−200
−33.2%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 90
+69.8%
|
50−55
−69.8%
|
| Metro Exodus | 55
+44.7%
|
35−40
−44.7%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+0%
|
170−180
+0%
|
| Valorant | 250−260
+15.1%
|
210−220
−15.1%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 121
+59.2%
|
75−80
−59.2%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 40−45
+48.3%
|
27−30
−48.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 90−95
+40.6%
|
60−65
−40.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 100−110
+43.8%
|
70−75
−43.8%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 65−70
+50%
|
45−50
−50%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 104
+50.7%
|
65−70
−50.7%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 40−45
+44.8%
|
27−30
−44.8%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 97
+79.6%
|
50−55
−79.6%
|
| Metro Exodus | 35
+45.8%
|
24−27
−45.8%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 76
+81%
|
40−45
−81%
|
| Valorant | 220−230
+36.7%
|
160−170
−36.7%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 72
+67.4%
|
40−45
−67.4%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 40−45
+44.8%
|
27−30
−44.8%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+46.2%
|
12−14
−46.2%
|
| Dota 2 | 141
+60.2%
|
85−90
−60.2%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 45−50
+45.5%
|
30−35
−45.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75
+42.9%
|
45−50
−42.9%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+58.1%
|
30−35
−58.1%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 52
+62.5%
|
30−35
−62.5%
|
This is how RTX 2080 Super Mobile and Pro W6600M compete in popular games:
- RTX 2080 Super Mobile is 37% faster in 1080p
- RTX 2080 Super Mobile is 36% faster in 1440p
- RTX 2080 Super Mobile is 44% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2080 Super Mobile is 128% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RTX 2080 Super Mobile performs better in 59 tests (98%)
- there's a draw in 1 test (2%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 36.68 | 27.28 |
| Recency | 2 April 2020 | 8 June 2021 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 90 Watt |
RTX 2080 Super Mobile has a 34% higher aggregate performance score.
Pro W6600M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 71% more advanced lithography process, and 67% lower power consumption.
The GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro W6600M in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro W6600M is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
