RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile

#ad 
Buy
RTX 2060 Mobile RTX 2060 Max-Q RTX 2060 Max-Q Refresh RTX 2060 Mobile Refresh RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile
VS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation RTX 4000 Ada Generation RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation RTX 4500 Ada Generation RTX 5000 Ada Generation RTX 5880 Ada Generation RTX 6000 Ada Generation

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile with RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2060 Mobile
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 115 Watt
29.27

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation outperforms RTX 2060 Mobile by an impressive 74% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RTX 2060 Mobile RTX 2060
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking20057
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency18.0051.31
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTU106AD104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date29 January 2019 (6 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19206144
Core clock speed960 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate144.0299.5
Floating-point processing power4.608 TFLOPS19.17 TFLOPS
ROPs4880
TMUs120192
Tensor Cores240192
Ray Tracing Cores3048

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB20 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/s280.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.58.9
DLSS++

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD104
−73.1%
180−190
+73.1%
1440p66
−66.7%
110−120
+66.7%
4K41
−70.7%
70−75
+70.7%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Counter-Strike 2 160−170
−70.7%
280−290
+70.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−58.7%
100−105
+58.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 60−65
−63.9%
100−105
+63.9%
Battlefield 5 104
−73.1%
180−190
+73.1%
Counter-Strike 2 160−170
−70.7%
280−290
+70.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−58.7%
100−105
+58.7%
Far Cry 5 96
−66.7%
160−170
+66.7%
Fortnite 162
−72.8%
280−290
+72.8%
Forza Horizon 4 108
−66.7%
180−190
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
−66.7%
150−160
+66.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 60−65
−63.9%
100−105
+63.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 171
−69.6%
290−300
+69.6%
Valorant 223
−57%
350−400
+57%
Battlefield 5 104
−73.1%
180−190
+73.1%
Counter-Strike 2 160−170
−70.7%
280−290
+70.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
−66.7%
450−500
+66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−58.7%
100−105
+58.7%
Dota 2 118
−69.5%
200−210
+69.5%
Far Cry 5 91
−64.8%
150−160
+64.8%
Fortnite 144
−66.7%
240−250
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 107
−68.2%
180−190
+68.2%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
−66.7%
150−160
+66.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 90
−66.7%
150−160
+66.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 60−65
−63.9%
100−105
+63.9%
Metro Exodus 56
−69.6%
95−100
+69.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 147
−70.1%
250−260
+70.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 111
−71.2%
190−200
+71.2%
Valorant 196
−53.1%
300−310
+53.1%
Battlefield 5 98
−73.5%
170−180
+73.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−58.7%
100−105
+58.7%
Dota 2 112
−69.6%
190−200
+69.6%
Far Cry 5 84
−66.7%
140−150
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 88
−70.5%
150−160
+70.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 60−65
−63.9%
100−105
+63.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 112
−69.6%
190−200
+69.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
−66.7%
100−105
+66.7%
Valorant 123
−70.7%
210−220
+70.7%
Fortnite 113
−68.1%
190−200
+68.1%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
−66.7%
110−120
+66.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 190−200
−51.5%
300−310
+51.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
−66.7%
90−95
+66.7%
Metro Exodus 35
−71.4%
60−65
+71.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−71.4%
300−310
+71.4%
Valorant 212
−65.1%
350−400
+65.1%
Battlefield 5 75
−73.3%
130−140
+73.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
−66.7%
50−55
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 63
−58.7%
100−105
+58.7%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−71.1%
130−140
+71.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
−71.9%
55−60
+71.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−73.5%
85−90
+73.5%
Fortnite 74
−62.2%
120−130
+62.2%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
−66.7%
50−55
+66.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
−72.7%
95−100
+72.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−60%
40−45
+60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
−66.7%
65−70
+66.7%
Valorant 171
−69.6%
290−300
+69.6%
Battlefield 5 42
−66.7%
70−75
+66.7%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
−66.7%
50−55
+66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Dota 2 87
−72.4%
150−160
+72.4%
Far Cry 5 33
−66.7%
55−60
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−66.7%
85−90
+66.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 38
−71.1%
65−70
+71.1%
Fortnite 34
−61.8%
55−60
+61.8%

This is how RTX 2060 Mobile and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 73% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 67% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 71% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 29.27 50.79
Recency 29 January 2019 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 70 Watt

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has a 73.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 233.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 140% more advanced lithography process, and 64.3% lower power consumption.

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile is a notebook card while RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2060
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX 2060 Mobile GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
vs
RTX 3050 A Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
vs
Pro W6800 Radeon Pro W6800
RTX 2060 Mobile GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
vs
RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU M3 Pro 14-Core GPU
vs
GeForce 940M GeForce 940M
UHD Graphics 710 UHD Graphics 710
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G4 Iris Xe Graphics G4
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4 Cores iGPU (Arc)
vs
Arc A730M Arc A730M
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
vs
7300 GT GeForce 7300 GT
RTX 2050 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q
vs
Arc A770 Arc A770
RTX 2080 GeForce RTX 2080
vs
6610 XL GeForce 6610 XL
GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650
vs
6600 GT GeForce 6600 GT
HD 8330E Radeon HD 8330E
vs
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
RX 6900 RX 6900
vs
RX 6900 XTX RX 6900 XTX
A10G A10G
vs
Tesla K40st Tesla K40st

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.2
1804 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4
54 votes

Rate RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile or RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.