RTX A2000 Mobile vs GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q

Place in the ranking	210	209
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	26.91	18.73
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	TU106	GA106
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	29 January 2020 (4 years ago)	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1920	2560
Core clock speed	975 MHz	893 MHz
Boost clock speed	1185 MHz	1358 MHz
Number of transistors	10,800 million	13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	95 Watt
Texture fill rate	142.2	108.6
Floating-point processing power	4.55 TFLOPS	6.953 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	48
TMUs	120	80
Tensor Cores	240	80
Ray Tracing Cores	30	20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1375 MHz	1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth	264.0 GB/s	176.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	7.5	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2060 Max-Q 25.30

RTX A2000 Mobile 25.74
+1.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2060 Max-Q 9761

RTX A2000 Mobile 9932
+1.8%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 2060 Max-Q 19779
+9.5%

RTX A2000 Mobile 18058

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 2060 Max-Q 50957

RTX A2000 Mobile 63738
+25.1%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 2060 Max-Q 14910
+13.3%

RTX A2000 Mobile 13157

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 2060 Max-Q 58890

RTX A2000 Mobile 60336
+2.5%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RTX 2060 Max-Q 5639
+12.4%

RTX A2000 Mobile 5016

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	90 +15.4%	78 −15.4%
1440p	44 +2.3%	43 −2.3%
4K	42 +5%	40 −5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

40−45

−80.5%

74
+80.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	79 +41.1%	55−60 −41.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 −27.9%	55 +27.9%
Battlefield 5	80−85 −1.2%	80−85 +1.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	82 +57.7%	50−55 −57.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 −51.2%	62 +51.2%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −1.7%	55−60 +1.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 −1.5%	65−70 +1.5%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −0.7%	140−150 +0.7%
Hitman 3	50−55 −2%	50−55 +2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 −0.9%	110−120 +0.9%
Metro Exodus	143 +62.5%	85−90 −62.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	93 +40.9%	65−70 −40.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	85−90 −1.2%	85−90 +1.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 −1.8%	55−60 +1.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +10.3%	39 −10.3%
Battlefield 5	80−85 −1.2%	80−85 +1.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75 +44.2%	50−55 −44.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 −22%	50 +22%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −1.7%	55−60 +1.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 −1.5%	65−70 +1.5%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −0.7%	140−150 +0.7%
Hitman 3	50−55 −2%	50−55 +2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 −0.9%	110−120 +0.9%
Metro Exodus	121 +37.5%	85−90 −37.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	82 +24.2%	65−70 −24.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	106 −1.9%	108 +1.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 −1.9%	55−60 +1.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45 −24.4%	55−60 +24.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +34.4%	32 −34.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55 +5.8%	50−55 −5.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +0%	41 +0%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −1.7%	55−60 +1.7%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −0.7%	140−150 +0.7%
Hitman 3	50−55 −2%	50−55 +2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 −0.9%	110−120 +0.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	93 −1.1%	94 +1.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	57 +14%	50 −14%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 +259%	29 −259%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

78
+18.2%

65−70

−18.2%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 −2.1%	45−50 +2.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −2.6%	35−40 +2.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −3.8%	27−30 +3.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 −8%	27 +8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −56.3%	25 +56.3%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −2.1%	140−150 +2.1%
Hitman 3	30−33 −3.3%	30−35 +3.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −1.9%	50−55 +1.9%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −2.1%	49 +2.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 −14.5%	63 +14.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 −3.2%	30−35 +3.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 −0.7%	140−150 +0.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45

−2.4%

40−45
+2.4%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Hitman 3	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 −1.6%	130−140 +1.6%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35 +6.1%	33 −6.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −7.1%	14−16 +7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 −12.9%	35 +12.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24

+0%

21−24

+0%

This is how RTX 2060 Max-Q and RTX A2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 2060 Max-Q is 15% faster in 1080p
RTX 2060 Max-Q is 2% faster in 1440p
RTX 2060 Max-Q is 5% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 2060 Max-Q is 259% faster.
in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX A2000 Mobile is 80% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 2060 Max-Q is ahead in 14 tests (19%)
RTX A2000 Mobile is ahead in 43 tests (60%)
there's a draw in 15 tests (21%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	25.30	25.74
Recency	29 January 2020	12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	95 Watt

RTX 2060 Max-Q has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

RTX A2000 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 1.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q and RTX A2000 Mobile.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q is a notebook graphics card while RTX A2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.