Arc Graphics 140V vs GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q and Arc Graphics 140V, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 2060 Max-Q
2020
6 GB GDDR6, 65 Watt
25.32
+90.8%

RTX 2060 Max-Q outperforms Arc Graphics 140V by an impressive 91% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking212386
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency26.71no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Xe² (2024)
GPU code nameTU106Lunar Lake iGPU
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date29 January 2020 (4 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19208
Core clock speed975 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1185 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Wattno data
Texture fill rate142.2no data
Floating-point processing power4.55 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48no data
TMUs120no data
Tensor Cores240no data
Ray Tracing Cores30no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount6 GB16 GB
Memory bus width192 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1375 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth264.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12_2
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2060 Max-Q 25.32
+90.8%
Arc Graphics 140V 13.27

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2060 Max-Q 9757
+90.8%
Arc Graphics 140V 5115

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 2060 Max-Q 19779
+85.1%
Arc Graphics 140V 10688

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 2060 Max-Q 50957
+30.5%
Arc Graphics 140V 39055

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 2060 Max-Q 14910
+57.1%
Arc Graphics 140V 9492

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 2060 Max-Q 58890
+11.1%
Arc Graphics 140V 53014

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RTX 2060 Max-Q 5639
+39.7%
Arc Graphics 140V 4038

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD93
+133%
40
−133%
1440p44
+120%
20
−120%
4K39
+117%
18−21
−117%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+95.2%
21−24
−95.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 79
+97.5%
40−45
−97.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+105%
21−24
−105%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+108%
40−45
−108%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 82
+105%
40−45
−105%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+95.2%
21−24
−95.2%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+93.3%
30−33
−93.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+120%
30−33
−120%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+96%
75−80
−96%
Hitman 3 50−55
+113%
24−27
−113%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+93.3%
60−65
−93.3%
Metro Exodus 143
+104%
70−75
−104%
Red Dead Redemption 2 93
+107%
45−50
−107%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+91.1%
45−50
−91.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+108%
50−55
−108%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+104%
27−30
−104%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+105%
21−24
−105%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+108%
40−45
−108%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75
+114%
35−40
−114%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+95.2%
21−24
−95.2%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+93.3%
30−33
−93.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+120%
30−33
−120%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+96%
75−80
−96%
Hitman 3 50−55
+113%
24−27
−113%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+93.3%
60−65
−93.3%
Metro Exodus 121
+102%
60−65
−102%
Red Dead Redemption 2 82
+105%
40−45
−105%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 106
+92.7%
55−60
−92.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+100%
27−30
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+108%
50−55
−108%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45
+114%
21−24
−114%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+105%
21−24
−105%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55
+104%
27−30
−104%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+95.2%
21−24
−95.2%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+93.3%
30−33
−93.3%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+96%
75−80
−96%
Hitman 3 50−55
+113%
24−27
−113%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+93.3%
60−65
−93.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 93
+107%
45−50
−107%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 57
+111%
27−30
−111%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+108%
50−55
−108%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 78
+95%
40−45
−95%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+100%
24−27
−100%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+111%
18−20
−111%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+117%
12−14
−117%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+108%
12−14
−108%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+107%
14−16
−107%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+100%
8−9
−100%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+107%
14−16
−107%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+92%
75−80
−92%
Hitman 3 30−33
+114%
14−16
−114%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+92.6%
27−30
−92.6%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+100%
24−27
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+104%
27−30
−104%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+93.8%
16−18
−93.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+103%
70−75
−103%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+100%
21−24
−100%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+108%
12−14
−108%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
+100%
10−11
−100%
Hitman 3 20−22
+100%
10−11
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+98.5%
65−70
−98.5%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+107%
14−16
−107%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
+94.4%
18−20
−94.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+94.4%
18−20
−94.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+93.8%
16−18
−93.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%

This is how RTX 2060 Max-Q and Arc Graphics 140V compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2060 Max-Q is 133% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2060 Max-Q is 120% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2060 Max-Q is 117% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.32 13.27
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 3 nm

RTX 2060 Max-Q has a 90.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc Graphics 140V, on the other hand, has a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Graphics 140V in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Arc Graphics 140V

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 369 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 140V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.