Arc Graphics 130T vs GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
MX570 MX570 A RTX 2050 Max-Q RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 3050 Max-Q RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Mobile RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Graphics 112EU Mobile Graphics 128EU Mobile Graphics 130T Graphics 130V Graphics 140T Graphics 140V

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and Arc Graphics 130T, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 2050 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 45 Watt
17.14
+11.8%

RTX 2050 Mobile outperforms Arc Graphics 130T by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 2050 Mobile
Arc Graphics 130T Arc Graphics 130T

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking341372
Place by popularity27not in top-100
Power efficiency28.55no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Xe+ (2025)
GPU code nameGA107no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date17 December 2021 (3 years ago)6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20487
Core clock speed1185 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1477 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)45 Wattno data
Texture fill rate94.53no data
Floating-point processing power6.05 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs64no data
Tensor Cores256no data
Ray Tracing Cores32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1750 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4ano data
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)no data
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD42
+20%
35−40
−20%
1440p32
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%
4K28
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 74
−20.3%
85−90
+20.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 47
+42.4%
30−35
−42.4%
HELLDIVERS 2 50
+72.4%
27−30
−72.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+10.4%
65−70
−10.4%
Counter-Strike 2 67
−32.8%
85−90
+32.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 42
+27.3%
30−35
−27.3%
Far Cry 5 59
+13.5%
50−55
−13.5%
Fortnite 90−95
+8%
85−90
−8%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+10.8%
65−70
−10.8%
Forza Horizon 5 62
+26.5%
45−50
−26.5%
HELLDIVERS 2 19
−52.6%
27−30
+52.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+12.1%
55−60
−12.1%
Valorant 130−140
+7.1%
120−130
−7.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+10.4%
65−70
−10.4%
Counter-Strike 2 40
−123%
85−90
+123%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+6.3%
200−210
−6.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 29
−13.8%
30−35
+13.8%
Dota 2 118
+18%
100−105
−18%
Far Cry 5 53
+1.9%
50−55
−1.9%
Fortnite 90−95
+8%
85−90
−8%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+10.8%
65−70
−10.8%
Forza Horizon 5 53
+8.2%
45−50
−8.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 68
+15.3%
55−60
−15.3%
HELLDIVERS 2 19
−52.6%
27−30
+52.6%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+12.1%
30−35
−12.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+12.1%
55−60
−12.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 58
+38.1%
40−45
−38.1%
Valorant 130−140
+7.1%
120−130
−7.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+10.4%
65−70
−10.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
−32%
30−35
+32%
Dota 2 110
+15.8%
95−100
−15.8%
Far Cry 5 49
−6.1%
50−55
+6.1%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+10.8%
65−70
−10.8%
HELLDIVERS 2 17
−70.6%
27−30
+70.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+12.1%
55−60
−12.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
−27.3%
40−45
+27.3%
Valorant 130−140
+12.5%
120−130
−12.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 90−95
+8%
85−90
−8%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+16.1%
30−35
−16.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+10.3%
110−120
−10.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+48%
24−27
−48%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+10%
20−22
−10%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+17.9%
140−150
−17.9%
Valorant 170−180
+6.9%
150−160
−6.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+11.4%
40−45
−11.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Far Cry 5 37
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+12.8%
35−40
−12.8%
HELLDIVERS 2 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+13%
21−24
−13%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+10.3%
27−30
−10.3%
HELLDIVERS 2 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+13.6%
21−24
−13.6%
Valorant 95−100
+12.6%
85−90
−12.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+13%
21−24
−13%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Dota 2 34
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Far Cry 5 18
+5.9%
16−18
−5.9%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%
HELLDIVERS 2 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%

This is how RTX 2050 Mobile and Arc Graphics 130T compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 20% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 19% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 17% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in HELLDIVERS 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX 2050 Mobile is 72% faster.
  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc Graphics 130T is 123% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 2050 Mobile is ahead in 49 tests (83%)
  • Arc Graphics 130T is ahead in 10 tests (17%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 17.14 15.33
Recency 17 December 2021 6 January 2025

RTX 2050 Mobile has a 11.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc Graphics 130T, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years.

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Graphics 130T in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Intel Arc Graphics 130T
Arc Graphics 130T
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX 2050 Mobile GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
vs
HD 8970M Crossfire Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
Arc Graphics 130T Arc Graphics 130T
vs
Arc Graphics 140T Arc Graphics 140T
RTX 2050 Mobile GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
vs
GTX 1650 Mobile GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
L4 L4
vs
Tesla M40 24 GB Tesla M40 24 GB
T400 4 GB T400 4 GB
vs
RX 7900 XT Radeon RX 7900 XT
A800 SXM4 80 GB A800 SXM4 80 GB
vs
UHD Graphics 770 UHD Graphics 770
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
vs
RX 6400 Radeon RX 6400
RX 6600S 6600S
vs
RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 2050 Mobile
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
vs
GeForce MX550 GeForce MX550
RTX 4080 SUPER 4080 SUPER
vs
RX 6800S RX 6800S
Arc Graphics 130V Arc Graphics 130V
vs
RX 6800S Radeon RX 6800S
RTX 5090 D 5090 D
vs
RX 6650M RX 6650M
RX 7600 XT Radeon RX 7600 XT
vs
Pro W6400 Radeon Pro W6400

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 2748 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc Graphics 130T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile or Arc Graphics 130T, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.