RTX A500 Embedded vs GeForce MX570

Place in the ranking	362	460
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	40.94	34.27
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2024)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	GA107	GA107S
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	May 2022 (2 years ago)	30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	2048
Core clock speed	832 MHz	435 MHz
Boost clock speed	1155 MHz	1335 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	20 Watt
Texture fill rate	73.92	85.44
Floating-point processing power	4.731 TFLOPS	5.468 TFLOPS
ROPs	40	32
TMUs	64	64
Tensor Cores	64	64
Ray Tracing Cores	16	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	96 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	8.6	8.6
DLSS	+	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce MX570 14.26
+49.3%

RTX A500 Embedded 9.55

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX570 5712
+49.4%

RTX A500 Embedded 3823

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

38
+58.3%

24−27

−58.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +56.3%	16−18 −56.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +61.1%	18−20 −61.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +60%	30−33 −60%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +56.3%	16−18 −56.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +61.1%	18−20 −61.1%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +50%	40−45 −50%
Forza Horizon 5	35−40 +62.5%	24−27 −62.5%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +51.9%	27−30 −51.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +50%	24−27 −50%
Valorant	60−65 +50%	40−45 −50%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +60%	30−33 −60%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +56.3%	16−18 −56.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +61.1%	18−20 −61.1%
Dota 2	12 +50%	8−9 −50%
Far Cry 5	68 +51.1%	45−50 −51.1%
Fortnite	80−85 +50.9%	55−60 −50.9%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +50%	40−45 −50%
Forza Horizon 5	35−40 +62.5%	24−27 −62.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	50−55 +51.4%	35−40 −51.4%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +51.9%	27−30 −51.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 +52.9%	70−75 −52.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +50%	24−27 −50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 +50%	30−33 −50%
Valorant	60−65 +50%	40−45 −50%
World of Tanks	190−200 +60.8%	120−130 −60.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +60%	30−33 −60%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +56.3%	16−18 −56.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +61.1%	18−20 −61.1%
Dota 2	50−55 +51.4%	35−40 −51.4%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +54.3%	35−40 −54.3%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +50%	40−45 −50%
Forza Horizon 5	35−40 +62.5%	24−27 −62.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 +52.9%	70−75 −52.9%
Valorant	60−65 +50%	40−45 −50%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	21−24 +57.1%	14−16 −57.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 +57.1%	14−16 −57.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	130−140 +54.4%	90−95 −54.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +62.5%	8−9 −62.5%
World of Tanks	100−110 +60%	65−70 −60%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30−33 +66.7%	18−20 −66.7%
Counter-Strike 2	18−20 +50%	12−14 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +50%	24−27 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +54.2%	24−27 −54.2%
Forza Horizon 5	21−24 +64.3%	14−16 −64.3%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +52.4%	21−24 −52.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 +66.7%	12−14 −66.7%
Valorant	35−40 +54.2%	24−27 −54.2%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Dota 2	24−27 +62.5%	16−18 −62.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 +62.5%	16−18 −62.5%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 +63%	27−30 −63%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +62.5%	16−18 −62.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 +55.6%	9−10 −55.6%
Counter-Strike 2	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Dota 2	24−27 +62.5%	16−18 −62.5%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +58.3%	12−14 −58.3%
Fortnite	16−18 +70%	10−11 −70%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +50%	14−16 −50%
Forza Horizon 5	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Valorant	16−18 +60%	10−11 −60%

This is how GeForce MX570 and RTX A500 Embedded compete in popular games:

GeForce MX570 is 58% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	14.26	9.55
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	20 Watt

GeForce MX570 has a 49.3% higher aggregate performance score.

RTX A500 Embedded, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 25% lower power consumption.

The GeForce MX570 is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A500 Embedded in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce MX570 is a notebook graphics card while RTX A500 Embedded is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

GeForce MX570

RTX A500 Embedded

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

GeForce GTX 760

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q

NVIDIA GeForce 6200

Radeon X600

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)

ATI Radeon X800 XT

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 94 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX A500 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX570 or RTX A500 Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.