Radeon R9 255 OEM vs GeForce MX570 A

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking343not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency43.19no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameGA107Cape Verde
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release dateMay 2022 (2 years ago)21 December 2013 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048512
Core clock speed832 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1155 MHz930 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate73.9229.76
Floating-point processing power4.731 TFLOPS0.9523 TFLOPS
ROPs4016
TMUs6432
Tensor Cores64no data
Ray Tracing Cores16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s73.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.65.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.2.131
CUDA8.6-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 8 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 65 Watt

MX570 A has a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 160% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce MX570 A and Radeon R9 255 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce MX570 A is a notebook card while Radeon R9 255 OEM is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A
GeForce MX570 A
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
Radeon R9 255 OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 54 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1066 votes

Rate Radeon R9 255 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.