GeForce 305M vs MX570 A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
MX570 MX570 A RTX 2050 Max-Q RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 3050 Max-Q RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Mobile RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
305M 310M 315M 405M G105M G210M ION 2

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX570 A and GeForce 305M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

MX570 A
2022
2 GB GDDR6, 25 Watt
13.99
+4015%

MX570 A outperforms 305M by a whopping 4015% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
MX570 A MX570 A
GeForce 305M GeForce 305M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3891327
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency45.201.96
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGA107GT218
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release dateMay 2022 (3 years ago)10 January 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204816
Core clock speed832 MHz525 MHz
Boost clock speed1155 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data260 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt14 Watt
Texture fill rate73.924.200
Floating-point processing power4.731 TFLOPS0.0368 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data55
ROPs404
TMUs648
Tensor Cores64no data
Ray Tracing Cores16no data
L1 Cache2 MBno data
L2 Cache2 MB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GBUp to 512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHzUp to 700 (DDR3), Up to 700 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s11.2 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsDisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power managementno data8.0

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.64.1
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL3.01.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA8.6+
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

MX570 A 13.99
+4015%
GeForce 305M 0.34

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

MX570 A 6183
+4022%
Samples: 190
GeForce 305M 150
Samples: 3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 29 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 13.99 0.34
Chip lithography 8 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 14 Watt

MX570 A has a 4014.7% higher aggregate performance score, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce 305M, on the other hand, has 78.6% lower power consumption.

The GeForce MX570 A is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 305M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A
GeForce MX570 A
NVIDIA GeForce 305M
GeForce 305M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

MX570 A GeForce MX570 A
vs
Arc Graphics 130T Arc Graphics 130T
GeForce 305M GeForce 305M
vs
GT 120M GeForce GT 120M
MX570 A GeForce MX570 A
vs
GTX 1650 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
vs
GeForce 805A GeForce 805A
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
vs
RX 580 XTR Radeon RX 580 XTR
RTX 3070 Ti GA102 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GA102
vs
Steam Deck OLED GPU Steam Deck OLED GPU
RX 7900 XTX Radeon RX 7900 XTX
vs
Playstation Portable GPU 65nm
Tesla T10 Tesla T10
vs
GTX 1060 5 GB GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
MX570 A GeForce MX570 A
vs
GT 705 OEM GeForce GT 705 OEM
MX570 A GeForce MX570 A
vs
R7 240 OEM Radeon R7 240 OEM
MX570 A GeForce MX570 A
vs
7050 SE + nForce 630a GeForce 7050 SE + nForce 630a
RTX 4060 Ti Mobile GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Mobile
vs
ROG Ally Extreme GPU ROG Ally Extreme GPU
RTX 4080 Ti Mobile GeForce RTX 4080 Ti Mobile
vs
GB10 GB10

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 78 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 4 votes

Rate GeForce 305M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX570 A or GeForce 305M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.