Arc A370M vs GeForce MX570 A

Aggregated performance score

MX570 A
2022
2 GB GDDR6
15.96
+1.3%

GeForce MX570 A outperforms Arc A370M by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking311315
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2022)Xe HPG (2020−2022)
GPU code nameGA107Alchemist
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateMay 2022 (2 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price$1574 no data

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20488
Core clock speedno data1550 MHz
Boost clock speed1155 MHz1550 MHz
Number of transistorsno data7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt50 Watt (35 - 50 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate73.9299.20

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on GeForce MX570 A and Arc A370M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed12 GB/s14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.6no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

MX570 A 15.96
+1.3%
Arc A370M 15.76

GeForce MX570 A outperforms Arc A370M by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

MX570 A 6179
+33.6%
Arc A370M 4625

GeForce MX570 A outperforms Arc A370M by 34% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
−11.4%
39
+11.4%
1440p21−24
+0%
21
+0%
4K30−35
−13.3%
34
+13.3%

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 15.96 15.76
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 50 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce MX570 A and Arc A370M.

Be aware that GeForce MX570 A is a desktop card while Arc A370M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A
GeForce MX570 A
Intel Arc A370M
Arc A370M

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 8 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 139 votes

Rate Arc A370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.