Arc 7-Cores iGPU vs GeForce MX550

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

GeForce MX550
2021
2 GB GDDR6, 15 Watt
11.83

Arc 7-Cores iGPU outperforms GeForce MX550 by a considerable 47% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking377292
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)Xe LPG
GPU code nameGN18-S5Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date17 December 2021 (2 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10247
Boost clock speed1320 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15-25 Wattno data
Texture fill rate42.24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce MX550 and Arc 7-Cores iGPU compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed12000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth96 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_2
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.2no data
CUDA7.5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX550 11.83
Arc 7-Cores iGPU 17.44
+47.4%

Arc 7-Cores iGPU outperforms GeForce MX550 by 47% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GeForce MX550 10005
Arc 7-Cores iGPU 11795
+17.9%

Arc 7-Cores iGPU outperforms GeForce MX550 by 18% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GeForce MX550 36560
Arc 7-Cores iGPU 38592
+5.6%

Arc 7-Cores iGPU outperforms GeForce MX550 by 6% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GeForce MX550 6126
Arc 7-Cores iGPU 8449
+37.9%

Arc 7-Cores iGPU outperforms GeForce MX550 by 38% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GeForce MX550 40364
Arc 7-Cores iGPU 45644
+13.1%

Arc 7-Cores iGPU outperforms GeForce MX550 by 13% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD44
+29.4%
34
−29.4%
4K28
−42.9%
40−45
+42.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−44%
35−40
+44%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−61.1%
27−30
+61.1%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−50%
55−60
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−52%
35−40
+52%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−11.8%
38
+11.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−48.5%
45−50
+48.5%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−45%
55−60
+45%
Hitman 3 27−30
−51.9%
40−45
+51.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−46.2%
55−60
+46.2%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−42.9%
50−55
+42.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−45.5%
45−50
+45.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60
+22.4%
45−50
−22.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−52.4%
30−35
+52.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−44%
35−40
+44%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−61.1%
27−30
+61.1%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−50%
55−60
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−52%
35−40
+52%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 70
+106%
34
−106%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−48.5%
45−50
+48.5%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−45%
55−60
+45%
Hitman 3 27−30
−51.9%
40−45
+51.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−46.2%
55−60
+46.2%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−51.4%
50−55
+51.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−45.5%
45−50
+45.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 26
−88.5%
45−50
+88.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
−4%
52
+4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−52.4%
30−35
+52.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−44%
35−40
+44%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−61.1%
27−30
+61.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−40%
35−40
+40%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−2.9%
35
+2.9%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−45%
55−60
+45%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−41%
55−60
+41%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−42.9%
50−55
+42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27
+22.7%
22
−22.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−52.4%
30−35
+52.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−36.4%
45−50
+36.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
−35%
27−30
+35%
Hitman 3 16−18
−56.3%
24−27
+56.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−62.5%
12−14
+62.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−87.5%
14−16
+87.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−52.6%
27−30
+52.6%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−54.5%
30−35
+54.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−45.8%
35−40
+45.8%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−58.3%
18−20
+58.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 27−30
−29.6%
35−40
+29.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
Hitman 3 8−9
−62.5%
12−14
+62.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−58.3%
18−20
+58.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−70%
16−18
+70%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Battlefield 5 10−12
−72.7%
18−20
+72.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%

This is how GeForce MX550 and Arc 7-Cores iGPU compete in popular games:

  • GeForce MX550 is 29% faster in 1080p
  • Arc 7-Cores iGPU is 43% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce MX550 is 106% faster.
  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc 7-Cores iGPU is 88% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GeForce MX550 is ahead in 3 tests (6%)
  • Arc 7-Cores iGPU is ahead in 46 tests (94%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.83 17.44
Recency 17 December 2021 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm

The Arc 7-Cores iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX550 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX550
GeForce MX550
Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU
Arc 7-Cores iGPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 699 votes

Rate GeForce MX550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 6 votes

Rate Arc 7-Cores iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.