Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs GeForce MX450

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX450 with Radeon Pro Vega 64X, including specs and performance data.

GeForce MX450
2020
2 GB GDDR5, GDDR6, 25 Watt
8.39

Pro Vega 64X outperforms MX450 by a whopping 256% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking469153
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency26.719.52
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameN17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1Vega 10
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 August 2020 (4 years ago)19 March 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8964096
Core clock speed1395 MHz1250 MHz
Boost clock speed1575 MHz1468 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt (12 - 29 Watt TGP)250 Watt
Texture fill rate100.8375.8
Floating-point processing power3.226 TFLOPS12.03 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs64256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5, GDDR6HBM2
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed10000 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth64.03 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.21.1.125
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce MX450 8.39
Pro Vega 64X 29.90
+256%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX450 3751
Pro Vega 64X 13369
+256%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GeForce MX450 28928
Pro Vega 64X 78565
+172%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD29
−245%
100−110
+245%
1440p17
−253%
60−65
+253%
4K25
−240%
85−90
+240%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 21−24
−241%
75−80
+241%
Counter-Strike 2 88
−241%
300−310
+241%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
−244%
110−120
+244%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 21−24
−241%
75−80
+241%
Battlefield 5 49
−247%
170−180
+247%
Counter-Strike 2 67
−243%
230−240
+243%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
−241%
75−80
+241%
Far Cry 5 34
−253%
120−130
+253%
Fortnite 61
−244%
210−220
+244%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−250%
140−150
+250%
Forza Horizon 5 34
−253%
120−130
+253%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−233%
110−120
+233%
Valorant 85−90
−237%
300−310
+237%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 21−24
−241%
75−80
+241%
Battlefield 5 38
−242%
130−140
+242%
Counter-Strike 2 28
−239%
95−100
+239%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
−224%
450−500
+224%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
−246%
45−50
+246%
Dota 2 88
−241%
300−310
+241%
Far Cry 5 29
−245%
100−105
+245%
Fortnite 39
−233%
130−140
+233%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−250%
140−150
+250%
Forza Horizon 5 26
−246%
90−95
+246%
Grand Theft Auto V 38
−242%
130−140
+242%
Metro Exodus 10
−250%
35−40
+250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−233%
110−120
+233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
−233%
110−120
+233%
Valorant 85−90
−237%
300−310
+237%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30
−233%
100−105
+233%
Cyberpunk 2077 8
−238%
27−30
+238%
Dota 2 81
−246%
280−290
+246%
Far Cry 5 27
−252%
95−100
+252%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−250%
140−150
+250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−233%
110−120
+233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
−250%
70−75
+250%
Valorant 85−90
−237%
300−310
+237%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 25
−240%
85−90
+240%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−244%
55−60
+244%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
−243%
240−250
+243%
Grand Theft Auto V 11
−218%
35−40
+218%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−256%
160−170
+256%
Valorant 100−110
−243%
350−400
+243%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 22
−241%
75−80
+241%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Far Cry 5 20
−250%
70−75
+250%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−241%
75−80
+241%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−221%
45−50
+221%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
−242%
65−70
+242%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
−243%
24−27
+243%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−250%
70−75
+250%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Valorant 45−50
−254%
170−180
+254%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
−218%
35−40
+218%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Dota 2 32
−244%
110−120
+244%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−233%
50−55
+233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%

This is how GeForce MX450 and Pro Vega 64X compete in popular games:

  • Pro Vega 64X is 245% faster in 1080p
  • Pro Vega 64X is 253% faster in 1440p
  • Pro Vega 64X is 240% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.39 29.90
Recency 1 August 2020 19 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 250 Watt

GeForce MX450 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.

Pro Vega 64X, on the other hand, has a 256.4% higher aggregate performance score, and a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX450 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce MX450 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro Vega 64X is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GeForce MX450
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Radeon Pro Vega 64X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 1343 votes

Rate GeForce MX450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 33 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 64X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX450 or Radeon Pro Vega 64X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.