Matrox Marvel G400-TV vs GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)G400 (1999−2002)
GPU code nameTU117Toucan
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date25 August 2020 (4 years ago)20 May 1999 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896no data
Core clock speed1035 MHz125 MHz
Boost clock speed1275 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,700 million10 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)31 Wattno data
Texture fill rate71.400.25
Floating-point processing power2.285 TFLOPSno data
ROPs322
TMUs562

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCI
Lengthno data150 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5SDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s2.656 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)6.0
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6None
OpenCL1.2None
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 August 2020 20 May 1999
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 250 nm

MX450 30.5W 8Gbps has an age advantage of 21 year, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1983.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps and Matrox Marvel G400-TV. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps is a notebook card while Matrox Marvel G400-TV is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps
GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps
Matrox Marvel G400-TV
Marvel G400-TV

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 10 votes

Rate GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Matrox Marvel G400-TV on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.