UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) vs GeForce MX450 25W

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated884
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data13.85
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Gen. 11 (2021)
GPU code nameTU117Gen. 11
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)11 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores89632
Core clock speed720 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed930 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt4.8 - 10 Watt
Texture fill rate52.08no data
Floating-point processing power1.667 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs56no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1250 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth80 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2-
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2020 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 12 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 4 Watt

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) has an age advantage of 4 months, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 525% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce MX450 25W and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU). We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W
GeForce MX450 25W
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 26 votes

Rate GeForce MX450 25W on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 17 votes

Rate UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.