P106M vs GeForce MX450 25W

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameTU117GP106
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)23 January 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8961152
Core clock speed720 MHz1291 MHz
Boost clock speed930 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,700 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate52.0892.95
Floating-point processing power1.667 TFLOPS2.974 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs5672

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s96.13 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.21.2
CUDA7.56.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2020 23 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 75 Watt

MX450 25W has an age advantage of 1 year, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

P106M, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce MX450 25W and P106M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce MX450 25W is a notebook graphics card while P106M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W
GeForce MX450 25W
NVIDIA P106M
P106M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 26 votes

Rate GeForce MX450 25W on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate P106M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.