ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 vs GeForce MX350

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX350 and Mobility Radeon HD 5650, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce MX350
2020
2 GB GDDR5, 20 Watt
7.14
+425%

MX350 outperforms ATI Mobility HD 5650 by a whopping 425% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5471016
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency25.076.37
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGP107Madison
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date10 February 2020 (5 years ago)7 January 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640400
Core clock speed747 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed937 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million627 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate29.989.000
Floating-point processing power1.199 TFLOPS0.36 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs3220

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1752 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth56.06 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce MX350 7.14
+425%
ATI Mobility HD 5650 1.36

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GeForce MX350 6166
+621%
ATI Mobility HD 5650 856

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GeForce MX350 4371
+499%
ATI Mobility HD 5650 730

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GeForce MX350 24744
+310%
ATI Mobility HD 5650 6036

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p75−80
+400%
15
−400%
Full HD27
+68.8%
16
−68.8%
1440p31
+520%
5−6
−520%
4K26
+550%
4−5
−550%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 31
+675%
4−5
−675%
Counter-Strike 2 14
+75%
8−9
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
+433%
3−4
−433%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 24
+500%
4−5
−500%
Battlefield 5 37
+1750%
2−3
−1750%
Counter-Strike 2 11
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+267%
3−4
−267%
Far Cry 5 27
+440%
5−6
−440%
Fortnite 82
+1950%
4−5
−1950%
Forza Horizon 4 37
+429%
7−8
−429%
Forza Horizon 5 21 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%
Valorant 129
+279%
30−35
−279%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 7
+75%
4−5
−75%
Battlefield 5 30
+1400%
2−3
−1400%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120
+208%
39
−208%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+100%
3−4
−100%
Dota 2 83
+388%
16−18
−388%
Far Cry 5 23
+475%
4−5
−475%
Fortnite 43
+975%
4−5
−975%
Forza Horizon 4 26
+271%
7−8
−271%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 35
+3400%
1−2
−3400%
Metro Exodus 12
+500%
2−3
−500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27
+350%
6−7
−350%
Valorant 116
+241%
30−35
−241%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24
+1100%
2−3
−1100%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Dota 2 76
+347%
16−18
−347%
Far Cry 5 21
+425%
4−5
−425%
Forza Horizon 4 19
+171%
7−8
−171%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
+167%
6−7
−167%
Valorant 70−75
+118%
30−35
−118%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27
+575%
4−5
−575%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
+563%
8−9
−563%
Grand Theft Auto V 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+388%
8−9
−388%
Valorant 75−80
+1200%
6−7
−1200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+20%
14−16
−20%
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 0−1
Valorant 35−40
+400%
7−8
−400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 30
+2900%
1−2
−2900%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how GeForce MX350 and ATI Mobility HD 5650 compete in popular games:

  • GeForce MX350 is 400% faster in 900p
  • GeForce MX350 is 69% faster in 1080p
  • GeForce MX350 is 520% faster in 1440p
  • GeForce MX350 is 550% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce MX350 is 3400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GeForce MX350 is ahead in 48 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.14 1.36
Recency 10 February 2020 7 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 15 Watt

GeForce MX350 has a 425% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

ATI Mobility HD 5650, on the other hand, has 33.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce MX350 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5650 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX350
GeForce MX350
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650
Mobility Radeon HD 5650

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1655 votes

Rate GeForce MX350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 267 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX350 or Mobility Radeon HD 5650, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.