GeForce 7300 SE vs GTX 1650 SUPER

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and GeForce 7300 SE, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1650 SUPER
2019
4 GB GDDR6, 100 Watt
26.38
+26280%

GTX 1650 SUPER outperforms 7300 SE by a whopping 26280% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2171458
Place by popularity48not in top-100
Power efficiency18.10no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameTU116G72
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date22 November 2019 (5 years ago)22 March 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280no data
Core clock speed1530 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed1725 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,600 million112 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Wattno data
Texture fill rate138.01.800
Floating-point processing power4.416 TFLOPSno data
ROPs322
TMUs804

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz266 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s4.256 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data
Multi Monitor+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.53.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1650 SUPER 26.38
+26280%
7300 SE 0.10

  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1650 SUPER 10165
+25964%
7300 SE 39

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD71-0−1
1440p37-0−1
4K23-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 99 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 61 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 63 0−1
Atomic Heart 73 0−1
Battlefield 5 72 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 48 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 50 0−1
Far Cry 5 93 0−1
Fortnite 120−130 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 95−100 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 75 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 0−1
Valorant 160−170 0−1
Atomic Heart 42 0−1
Battlefield 5 58 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 39 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 40 0−1
Dota 2 209 0−1
Far Cry 5 86 0−1
Fortnite 120−130 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 95−100 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 75 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 103 0−1
Metro Exodus 51 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90 0−1
Valorant 160−170 0−1
Battlefield 5 57 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 35 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 34 0−1
Dota 2 191 0−1
Far Cry 5 79 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 95−100 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 51 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50 0−1
Valorant 160−170 0−1
Fortnite 120−130 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 24−27 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 45 0−1
Metro Exodus 29 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 0−1
Valorant 200−210 0−1
Battlefield 5 42 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 20 0−1
Far Cry 5 54 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 60−65 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 54 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45 0−1
Fortnite 55−60 0−1
Atomic Heart 20−22 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 12−14 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 45 0−1
Metro Exodus 16 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 32 0−1
Valorant 140−150 0−1
Battlefield 5 24 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3 0−1
Dota 2 80 0−1
Far Cry 5 24 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 39 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27 0−1
Fortnite 27−30 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.38 0.10
Recency 22 November 2019 22 March 2006
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 90 nm

GTX 1650 SUPER has a 26280% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7300 SE in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
NVIDIA GeForce 7300 SE
GeForce 7300 SE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1
4907 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3
21 vote

Rate GeForce 7300 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER or GeForce 7300 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.