GeForce 9700M GT vs MX350

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX350 and GeForce 9700M GT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce MX350
2020
2 GB GDDR5, 20 Watt
7.32
+1256%

MX350 outperforms 9700M GT by a whopping 1256% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5391227
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency25.200.83
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGP107G96
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date10 February 2020 (4 years ago)29 July 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64032
Core clock speed747 MHz625 MHz
Boost clock speed937 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate29.9810.00
Floating-point processing power1.199 TFLOPS0.0992 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data148
ROPs168
TMUs3216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-II
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1752 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth56.06 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.1+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX350 7.32
+1256%
9700M GT 0.54

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX350 2813
+1252%
9700M GT 208

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27
+2600%
1−2
−2600%
1440p31
+1450%
2−3
−1450%
4K26
+2500%
1−2
−2500%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14
+75%
8−9
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Elden Ring 20
+1900%
1−2
−1900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 27
+2600%
1−2
−2600%
Counter-Strike 2 11
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
+150%
2−3
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 32
+433%
6−7
−433%
Metro Exodus 28
+1300%
2−3
−1300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 32
+540%
5−6
−540%
Valorant 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 4
+100%
2−3
−100%
Dota 2 51
+1600%
3−4
−1600%
Elden Ring 13 0−1
Far Cry 5 50
+614%
7−8
−614%
Fortnite 40−45 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 25
+317%
6−7
−317%
Grand Theft Auto V 35
+1650%
2−3
−1650%
Metro Exodus 17
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85
+963%
8−9
−963%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+360%
5−6
−360%
Valorant 21
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
World of Tanks 120
+650%
16−18
−650%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 17
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 3
+50%
2−3
−50%
Dota 2 76
+1420%
5−6
−1420%
Far Cry 5 40
+471%
7−8
−471%
Forza Horizon 4 19
+217%
6−7
−217%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+638%
8−9
−638%
Valorant 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 8−9 0−1
Elden Ring 9−10 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+1200%
3−4
−1200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7 0−1
World of Tanks 50−55
+5200%
1−2
−5200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Metro Exodus 10−12 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Valorant 18−20
+280%
5−6
−280%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 18−20
+20%
14−16
−20%
Elden Ring 4−5 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+20%
14−16
−20%
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+20%
14−16
−20%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 30
+100%
14−16
−100%
Far Cry 5 9−10 0−1
Fortnite 7−8 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 0−1
Valorant 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%

This is how GeForce MX350 and 9700M GT compete in popular games:

  • GeForce MX350 is 2600% faster in 1080p
  • GeForce MX350 is 1450% faster in 1440p
  • GeForce MX350 is 2500% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in World of Tanks, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce MX350 is 5200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GeForce MX350 surpassed 9700M GT in all 33 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.32 0.54
Recency 10 February 2020 29 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 45 Watt

GeForce MX350 has a 1255.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 125% lower power consumption.

The GeForce MX350 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9700M GT in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX350
GeForce MX350
NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT
GeForce 9700M GT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1647 votes

Rate GeForce MX350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 7 votes

Rate GeForce 9700M GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.