GRID M3-3020 vs GeForce MX350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q GTX 1050 Max-Q GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q MX150 GP107 MX350
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GRID M3-3020 GRID M10-8Q GRID M40 NVS 810 K620 K1200 K2200 Tesla M10

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX350 with GRID M3-3020, including specs and performance data.

GeForce MX350
2020
2 GB GDDR5, 20 Watt
6.70

M3-3020 outperforms MX350 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GeForce MX350 GeForce MX350
GRID M3-3020 GRID M3-3020

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking597587
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency25.96no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameGP107GM107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date10 February 2020 (5 years ago)18 May 2016 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640640
Core clock speed747 MHz1033 MHz
Boost clock speed937 MHz1306 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Wattno data
Texture fill rate29.9852.24
Floating-point processing power1.199 TFLOPS1.672 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs3240
L1 Cache240 KB320 KB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1752 MHz1300 MHz
Memory bandwidth56.06 GB/s83.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA6.15.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD26
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
1440p27
+0%
27−30
+0%
4K26
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 66
+1.5%
65−70
−1.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
+0%
16−18
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 37
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Counter-Strike 2 50
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+10%
10−11
−10%
Escape from Tarkov 36
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
Far Cry 5 27
+0%
27−30
+0%
Fortnite 82
−3.7%
85−90
+3.7%
Forza Horizon 4 37
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Forza Horizon 5 25
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Valorant 129
−0.8%
130−140
+0.8%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 30
+0%
30−33
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 83
−2.4%
85−90
+2.4%
Escape from Tarkov 34
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
Far Cry 5 23
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Fortnite 43
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%
Forza Horizon 4 26
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Forza Horizon 5 16
+0%
16−18
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 12
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 116
−3.4%
120−130
+3.4%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 76
+1.3%
75−80
−1.3%
Escape from Tarkov 25
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Far Cry 5 21
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 19
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 70−75
−1.4%
75−80
+1.4%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 27
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
−3.8%
55−60
+3.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 75−80
−3.9%
80−85
+3.9%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 30
+0%
30−33
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

This is how GeForce MX350 and GRID M3-3020 compete in popular games:

  • GRID M3-3020 is 4% faster in 1080p
  • A tie in 1440p
  • GRID M3-3020 is 4% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 6.70 7.00
Recency 10 February 2020 18 May 2016
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm

GeForce MX350 has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

GRID M3-3020, on the other hand, has a 4.5% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce MX350 and GRID M3-3020.

Be aware that GeForce MX350 is a notebook graphics card while GRID M3-3020 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce MX350
GeForce MX350
NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
GRID M3-3020
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GeForce MX350 GeForce MX350
vs
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)
GRID M3-3020 GRID M3-3020
vs
FirePro W5000 FirePro W5000
GeForce MX350 GeForce MX350
vs
Vega 7 Radeon Vega 7
GeForce MX350 GeForce MX350
vs
ATI All-In-Wonder VE All-In-Wonder VE
GeForce MX350 GeForce MX350
vs
ATI VE PCI Radeon VE PCI
GeForce MX350 GeForce MX350
vs
8800 GTS 320 GeForce 8800 GTS 320
GeForce MX350 GeForce MX350
vs
ATI FireGL V7300 FireGL V7300
GeForce MX350 GeForce MX350
vs
RX Vega 11 Radeon RX Vega 11
GeForce MX350 GeForce MX350
vs
ATI Fire GL1 Fire GL1
GeForce MX330 GeForce MX330
vs
ATI All-In-Wonder HD 3650 All-In-Wonder HD 3650
GeForce MX330 GeForce MX330
vs
Iris Xe MAX Graphics Iris Xe MAX Graphics
GeForce MX330 GeForce MX330
vs
R9 390X2 Radeon R9 390X2
Maxwell GPU Surface Book Maxwell GPU Surface Book
vs
GTX 950 Low Power GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 1751 votes

Rate GeForce MX350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate GRID M3-3020 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX350 or GRID M3-3020, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.