NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
Comparison of GeForce MX250 and Radeon RX Vega 9 architecture, market type and release date.
GeForce MX250 and Radeon RX Vega 9's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of GeForce MX250 and Radeon RX Vega 9's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
37.97 GTexel / s
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on GeForce MX250 and Radeon RX Vega 9 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
Parameters of memory installed on GeForce MX250 and Radeon RX Vega 9: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
48.06 GB / s
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on GeForce MX250 and Radeon RX Vega 9.
Technological solutions and APIs supported by GeForce MX250 and Radeon RX Vega 9. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
APIs supported by GeForce MX250 and Radeon RX Vega 9, sometimes including their particular versions.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of GeForce MX250 and Radeon RX Vega 9. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
GeForce MX250 7.18
RX Vega 9 8.13 +13.2%
3DMark Ice Storm GPU
GeForce MX250 221026 +67.5%
RX Vega 9 131922
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
GeForce MX250 22232 +15.5%
RX Vega 9 19255
3DMark Fire Strike Score
GeForce MX250 3281 +30%
RX Vega 9 2524
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
GeForce MX250 3676 +31.8%
RX Vega 9 2789
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
GeForce MX250 4655 +6.3%
RX Vega 9 4380
3DMark Vantage Performance
GeForce MX250 16488 +30.6%
RX Vega 9 12628
Let's see how good GeForce MX250 and Radeon RX Vega 9 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX250
Much newer (15 February 2019 vs 26 October 2017)
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
13.2% faster in synthetic tests
More pipelines (576 vs 384)
Shared Memory (up to Dual-Channel DDR4-2400)
So, MX250 or RX Vega 9?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends AMD Radeon RX Vega 9.
Should you still have questions on choice between GeForce MX250 and Radeon RX Vega 9, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.