RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell vs GeForce MX150

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX150 with RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, including specs and performance data.

GeForce MX150
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 10 Watt
5.66

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell outperforms MX150 by a whopping 1419% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6326
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.87
Power efficiency40.07no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGP108GB202
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date17 May 2017 (7 years ago)18 March 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$8,565

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38424064
Core clock speed937 MHz1590 MHz
Boost clock speed1038 MHz2617 MHz
Number of transistors1,800 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate24.911,968
Floating-point processing power0.7972 TFLOPS126 TFLOPS
ROPs16192
TMUs24752
Tensor Coresno data752
Ray Tracing Coresno data188

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount4 GB96 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/s1.79 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA6.112.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce MX150 5.66
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 85.96
+1419%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX150 2259
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 34320
+1419%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27
−1381%
400−450
+1381%
1440p30
−1400%
450−500
+1400%
4K18
−1400%
270−280
+1400%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data21.41
1440pno data19.03
4Kno data31.72

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 10−12
−1355%
160−170
+1355%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−1300%
350−400
+1300%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−1355%
160−170
+1355%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 10−12
−1355%
160−170
+1355%
Battlefield 5 39
−1310%
550−600
+1310%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−1300%
350−400
+1300%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
−1355%
160−170
+1355%
Far Cry 5 17
−1371%
250−260
+1371%
Fortnite 59
−1341%
850−900
+1341%
Forza Horizon 4 25
−1300%
350−400
+1300%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−1367%
220−230
+1367%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 26
−1246%
350−400
+1246%
Valorant 100
−1400%
1500−1550
+1400%

Full HD
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 10−12
−1355%
160−170
+1355%
Battlefield 5 32
−1306%
450−500
+1306%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−1300%
350−400
+1300%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 87
−1394%
1300−1350
+1394%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
−1329%
100−105
+1329%
Dota 2 68
−1371%
1000−1050
+1371%
Far Cry 5 16
−1400%
240−250
+1400%
Fortnite 34
−1371%
500−550
+1371%
Forza Horizon 4 21
−1329%
300−310
+1329%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−1367%
220−230
+1367%
Grand Theft Auto V 26
−1246%
350−400
+1246%
Metro Exodus 6
−1400%
90−95
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 22
−1264%
300−310
+1264%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
−1374%
280−290
+1374%
Valorant 100
−1400%
1500−1550
+1400%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 10−12
−1355%
160−170
+1355%
Battlefield 5 26
−1246%
350−400
+1246%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−1355%
160−170
+1355%
Dota 2 62
−1352%
900−950
+1352%
Far Cry 5 14
−1400%
210−220
+1400%
Forza Horizon 4 14
−1400%
210−220
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 15
−1367%
220−230
+1367%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
−1355%
160−170
+1355%
Valorant 65−70
−1362%
950−1000
+1362%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24
−1358%
350−400
+1358%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−1344%
130−140
+1344%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 55
−1355%
800−850
+1355%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
−1400%
90−95
+1400%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−1400%
75−80
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 43
−1412%
650−700
+1412%
Valorant 66
−1415%
1000−1050
+1415%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 6−7
−1400%
90−95
+1400%
Battlefield 5 7−8
−1329%
100−105
+1329%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1400%
60−65
+1400%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−1400%
150−160
+1400%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1362%
190−200
+1362%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−1329%
100−105
+1329%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
−1355%
160−170
+1355%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30
−1400%
450−500
+1400%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−1371%
250−260
+1371%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
Valorant 33
−1415%
500−550
+1415%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−1400%
45−50
+1400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
Dota 2 24
−1358%
350−400
+1358%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1400%
75−80
+1400%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−1400%
120−130
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−1400%
90−95
+1400%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−1400%
75−80
+1400%

This is how GeForce MX150 and RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 1381% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 1400% faster in 1440p
  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 1400% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.66 85.96
Recency 17 May 2017 18 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 96 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 600 Watt

GeForce MX150 has 5900% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, on the other hand, has a 1418.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX150 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce MX150 is a notebook card while RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GeForce MX150
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1710 votes

Rate GeForce MX150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 13 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX150 or RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.