GeForce G 105M vs MX150

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX150 and GeForce G 105M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce MX150
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 10 Watt
5.76
+3500%

MX150 outperforms G 105M by a whopping 3500% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6001427
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency40.450.80
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)G9x (2007−2010)
GPU code nameGP108N10M-GE1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date17 May 2017 (7 years ago)8 January 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3848
Core clock speed937 MHz640 MHz
Boost clock speed1038 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt14 Watt
Texture fill rate24.91no data
Floating-point processing power0.7972 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR2, GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce MX150 5.76
+3500%
G 105M 0.16

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX150 2265
+3553%
G 105M 62

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GeForce MX150 10992
+1295%
G 105M 788

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD280−1
1440p300−1
4K190−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Battlefield 5 39
+3800%
1−2
−3800%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Far Cry 5 17 0−1
Fortnite 59
+5800%
1−2
−5800%
Forza Horizon 4 25
+1150%
2−3
−1150%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 26
+271%
7−8
−271%
Valorant 100
+300%
24−27
−300%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Battlefield 5 32 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 87
+691%
10−12
−691%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
+600%
1−2
−600%
Dota 2 68
+656%
9−10
−656%
Far Cry 5 16 0−1
Fortnite 34 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 21
+950%
2−3
−950%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 26 0−1
Metro Exodus 6 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 22
+214%
7−8
−214%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
+533%
3−4
−533%
Valorant 100
+300%
24−27
−300%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 26 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Dota 2 62
+589%
9−10
−589%
Far Cry 5 14 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 14
+600%
2−3
−600%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 15
+114%
7−8
−114%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
+267%
3−4
−267%
Valorant 65−70
+160%
24−27
−160%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 55
+5400%
1−2
−5400%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7 0−1
Metro Exodus 5−6 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 43
+4200%
1−2
−4200%
Valorant 66
+6500%
1−2
−6500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 8−9 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−12 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 9−10 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12 0−1

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 0−1
Valorant 33
+1550%
2−3
−1550%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 24 0−1
Far Cry 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce MX150 is 4200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GeForce MX150 surpassed G 105M in all 32 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.76 0.16
Recency 17 May 2017 8 January 2009
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 14 Watt

GeForce MX150 has a 3500% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.

The GeForce MX150 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce G 105M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GeForce MX150
NVIDIA GeForce G 105M
GeForce G 105M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1670 votes

Rate GeForce MX150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 45 votes

Rate GeForce G 105M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX150 or GeForce G 105M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.