Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce MX130

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX130 with RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GeForce MX130
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
4.07
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
2024
4 GB GDDR6, 35 Watt
23.52
+478%

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms MX130 by a whopping 478% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking663218
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.7953.45
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGM108AD107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date17 November 2017 (7 years ago)26 February 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842048
Core clock speed1122 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speed1242 MHz2025 MHz
Number of transistorsno data18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate29.81129.6
Floating-point processing power0.9539 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2464
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce MX130 4.07
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 23.52
+478%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GeForce MX130 2875
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 20239
+604%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GeForce MX130 11968
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 66297
+454%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GeForce MX130 2345
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 14136
+503%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

GeForce MX130 645
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 5278
+719%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
−456%
100−110
+456%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 12
−442%
65−70
+442%
Counter-Strike 2 27
−456%
150−160
+456%
Cyberpunk 2077 4
−425%
21−24
+425%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 8
−463%
45−50
+463%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−456%
100−105
+456%
Counter-Strike 2 20
−450%
110−120
+450%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%
Far Cry 5 14
−471%
80−85
+471%
Fortnite 32
−463%
180−190
+463%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−471%
120−130
+471%
Forza Horizon 5 15
−467%
85−90
+467%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 23
−465%
130−140
+465%
Valorant 55−60
−426%
300−310
+426%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−456%
100−105
+456%
Counter-Strike 2 12
−442%
65−70
+442%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
−419%
400−450
+419%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%
Dota 2 35
−471%
200−210
+471%
Far Cry 5 13
−477%
75−80
+477%
Fortnite 24
−442%
130−140
+442%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−471%
120−130
+471%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
−467%
85−90
+467%
Metro Exodus 3
−433%
16−18
+433%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21
−471%
120−130
+471%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
−471%
80−85
+471%
Valorant 55−60
−426%
300−310
+426%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−456%
100−105
+456%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%
Dota 2 28
−471%
160−170
+471%
Far Cry 5 12
−442%
65−70
+442%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−471%
120−130
+471%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14
−471%
80−85
+471%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
−471%
40−45
+471%
Valorant 55−60
−426%
300−310
+426%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16
−463%
90−95
+463%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
−459%
190−200
+459%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−476%
190−200
+476%
Valorant 45−50
−463%
270−280
+463%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−463%
90−95
+463%
Valorant 21−24
−445%
120−130
+445%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Dota 2 14−16
−467%
85−90
+467%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%

This is how GeForce MX130 and Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is 456% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.07 23.52
Recency 17 November 2017 26 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 35 Watt

GeForce MX130 has 16.7% lower power consumption.

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 477.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX130 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce MX130 is a notebook graphics card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX130
GeForce MX130
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 500 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 2329 votes

Rate GeForce MX130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 20 votes

Rate RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX130 or RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.