RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce MX130

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX130 with RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GeForce MX130
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
4.57

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms MX130 by a whopping 981% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking64955
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.9030.74
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGM108no data
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date17 November 2017 (7 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3845120
Core clock speed1122 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1242 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt115 Watt (60 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate29.81no data
Floating-point processing power0.9539 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB12 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX130 4.57
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 49.40
+981%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX130 1826
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 19741
+981%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GeForce MX130 2875
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 41630
+1348%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GeForce MX130 2345
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 29248
+1147%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

GeForce MX130 645
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 12806
+1887%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17
−959%
180−190
+959%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−977%
140−150
+977%
Cyberpunk 2077 4
−900%
40−45
+900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−971%
150−160
+971%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−977%
140−150
+977%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−900%
100−105
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 22
−945%
230−240
+945%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−956%
95−100
+956%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−900%
110−120
+900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−967%
160−170
+967%
Valorant 12−14
−977%
140−150
+977%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−971%
150−160
+971%
Counter-Strike 2 3
−900%
30−33
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−900%
100−105
+900%
Dota 2 21
−948%
220−230
+948%
Far Cry 5 26
−977%
280−290
+977%
Fortnite 24
−942%
250−260
+942%
Forza Horizon 4 16
−963%
170−180
+963%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−956%
95−100
+956%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
−967%
160−170
+967%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−900%
110−120
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35
−900%
350−400
+900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−967%
160−170
+967%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
−971%
150−160
+971%
Valorant 12−14
−977%
140−150
+977%
World of Tanks 75−80
−926%
800−850
+926%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−971%
150−160
+971%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−977%
140−150
+977%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−900%
100−105
+900%
Dota 2 28
−971%
300−310
+971%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−943%
240−250
+943%
Forza Horizon 4 14
−971%
150−160
+971%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−956%
95−100
+956%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10
−900%
100−105
+900%
Valorant 12−14
−977%
140−150
+977%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
−900%
50−55
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−838%
300−310
+838%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
World of Tanks 30−35
−929%
350−400
+929%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−971%
75−80
+971%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−900%
50−55
+900%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−900%
100−105
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−971%
75−80
+971%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−900%
60−65
+900%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−963%
85−90
+963%
Valorant 12−14
−977%
140−150
+977%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−900%
110−120
+900%
Dota 2 16−18
−959%
180−190
+959%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−963%
170−180
+963%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−977%
140−150
+977%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−963%
170−180
+963%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−900%
110−120
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Dota 2 16−18
−959%
180−190
+959%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−900%
50−55
+900%
Fortnite 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Valorant 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%

This is how GeForce MX130 and RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is 959% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.57 49.40
Recency 17 November 2017 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 115 Watt

GeForce MX130 has 283.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 981% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX130 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce MX130 is a notebook graphics card while RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX130
GeForce MX130
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 2290 votes

Rate GeForce MX130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 9 votes

Rate RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.