UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) vs GeForce MX110

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX110 and UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce MX110
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
3.71
+61.3%

MX110 outperforms UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) by an impressive 61% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking710853
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.47no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameGM108STiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date17 November 2017 (7 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25616
Core clock speed978 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1006 MHz1450 MHz
Number of transistors1,020 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Wattno data
Texture fill rate16.10no data
Floating-point processing power0.5151 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1253 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12_1
Shader Model6.7 (5.1)no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX110 3.71
+61.3%
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 2.30

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GeForce MX110 2121
+28.2%
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 1654

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GeForce MX110 9124
+26.9%
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 7190

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GeForce MX110 1714
+42.5%
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 1203

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GeForce MX110 11266
+41.1%
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 7982

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GeForce MX110 124036
+91.7%
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 64701

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

GeForce MX110 451
+29.5%
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 348

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17
+54.5%
11
−54.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Battlefield 5 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Far Cry 5 10
+150%
4−5
−150%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Hitman 3 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+36.8%
18−20
−36.8%
Metro Exodus 13
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 13
+160%
5−6
−160%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
+60%
10−11
−60%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+16.7%
35−40
−16.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12
+50%
8−9
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Battlefield 5 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Far Cry 5 8
+100%
4−5
−100%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Hitman 3 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+36.8%
18−20
−36.8%
Metro Exodus 5
+400%
1−2
−400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+27.3%
11
−27.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+15.4%
12−14
−15.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+16.7%
35−40
−16.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Far Cry 5 6
+50%
4−5
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Hitman 3 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+36.8%
18−20
−36.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+0%
14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
+0%
5
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+16.7%
35−40
−16.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Hitman 3 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+76.9%
12−14
−76.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

This is how GeForce MX110 and UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) compete in popular games:

  • GeForce MX110 is 55% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GeForce MX110 is 1200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GeForce MX110 is ahead in 53 tests (95%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.71 2.30
Recency 17 November 2017 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm

GeForce MX110 has a 61.3% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce MX110 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GeForce MX110
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 2278 votes

Rate GeForce MX110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 361 vote

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.