ATI Radeon X800 vs GeForce MX110

Place in the ranking	714	1379
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	8.55	0.51
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2017)	R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code name	GM108S	R430
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	17 November 2017 (7 years ago)	1 October 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	256	no data
Core clock speed	978 MHz	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	1006 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1,020 million	160 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	30 Watt
Texture fill rate	16.10	4.800
Floating-point processing power	0.5151 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	8	12
TMUs	16	12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x4	PCIe 1.0 x16
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	256 MB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1253 MHz	350 MHz
Memory bandwidth	40.1 GB/s	22.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model	6.7 (5.1)	no data
OpenGL	4.6	2.0
OpenCL	3.0	N/A
Vulkan	1.3	N/A
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX110 3.72
+1591%

ATI X800 0.22

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX110 1429
+1601%

ATI X800 84

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9	0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	9−10	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +1600%	1−2 −1600%
Forza Horizon 5	5−6	0−1
Metro Exodus	10	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	13	0−1
Valorant	8−9	0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	9−10	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9	0−1
Dota 2	21 +2000%	1−2 −2000%
Far Cry 5	23 +2200%	1−2 −2200%
Fortnite	17 +1600%	1−2 −1600%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +1600%	1−2 −1600%
Forza Horizon 5	5−6	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	13	0−1
Metro Exodus	8−9	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	34 +1600%	2−3 −1600%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14	0−1
Valorant	8−9	0−1
World of Tanks	45 +2150%	2−3 −2150%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	9−10	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9	0−1
Dota 2	33 +3200%	1−2 −3200%
Far Cry 5	15	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +1600%	1−2 −1600%
Forza Horizon 5	5−6	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8	0−1
Valorant	8−9	0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	2−3	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	3−4	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	24−27 +2500%	1−2 −2500%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4	0−1
World of Tanks	24−27 +2500%	1−2 −2500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +3000%	1−2 −3000%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5	0−1
Far Cry 5	8−9	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	4−5	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	5−6	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8	0−1
Valorant	10−12	0−1

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10−11	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3	0−1
Dota 2	16−18	0−1
Far Cry 5	4−5	0−1
Fortnite	2−3	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	2−3	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	2−3	0−1
Valorant	3−4	0−1

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.72	0.22
Recency	17 November 2017	1 October 2004
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	256 MB
Chip lithography	28 nm	110 nm

GeForce MX110 has a 1590.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce MX110 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X800 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce MX110 is a notebook card while Radeon X800 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.