Radeon RX 6850M XT vs GeForce MX110

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX110 and Radeon RX 6850M XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce MX110
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
3.51

RX 6850M XT outperforms MX110 by a whopping 1124% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking758102
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.4418.79
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGM108SNavi 22
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date17 November 2017 (7 years ago)4 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2562560
Core clock speed978 MHz2321 MHz
Boost clock speed1006 MHz2581 MHz
Number of transistors1,020 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt165 Watt
Texture fill rate16.10413.0
Floating-point processing power0.5151 TFLOPS13.21 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs16160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB12 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.7 (5.1)6.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce MX110 3.51
RX 6850M XT 42.97
+1124%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX110 1416
RX 6850M XT 17336
+1124%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GeForce MX110 2121
RX 6850M XT 42016
+1881%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GeForce MX110 1714
RX 6850M XT 33901
+1878%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GeForce MX110 11266
RX 6850M XT 172972
+1435%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

GeForce MX110 451
RX 6850M XT 11837
+2528%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
−661%
137
+661%
1440p6−7
−1317%
85
+1317%
4K4−5
−1325%
57
+1325%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−1833%
230−240
+1833%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−2186%
160
+2186%
Dead Island 2 10−11
−1830%
190−200
+1830%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 14
−886%
130−140
+886%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−1833%
230−240
+1833%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−1843%
136
+1843%
Dead Island 2 10−11
−1830%
190−200
+1830%
Far Cry 5 10
−990%
109
+990%
Fortnite 30
−497%
170−180
+497%
Forza Horizon 4 16
−900%
160−170
+900%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−1525%
130−140
+1525%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18
−794%
160−170
+794%
Valorant 50−55
−376%
230−240
+376%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12
−1050%
130−140
+1050%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−1833%
230−240
+1833%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45
−518%
270−280
+518%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−1414%
106
+1414%
Dead Island 2 10−11
−1830%
190−200
+1830%
Dota 2 36
−214%
113
+214%
Far Cry 5 9
−1067%
105
+1067%
Fortnite 15
−1093%
170−180
+1093%
Forza Horizon 4 12
−1233%
160−170
+1233%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−1525%
130−140
+1525%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
−869%
126
+869%
Metro Exodus 2
−5700%
116
+5700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 17
−847%
160−170
+847%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
−2100%
198
+2100%
Valorant 50−55
−376%
230−240
+376%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−962%
130−140
+962%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−1143%
87
+1143%
Dead Island 2 10−11
−1830%
190−200
+1830%
Dota 2 33
−188%
95
+188%
Far Cry 5 8
−1175%
102
+1175%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−900%
160−170
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12
−1242%
160−170
+1242%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
−2340%
122
+2340%
Valorant 50−55
−376%
230−240
+376%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12
−1392%
170−180
+1392%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−2080%
100−110
+2080%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
−1019%
290−300
+1019%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
−2867%
89
+2867%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−3300%
68
+3300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−600%
170−180
+600%
Valorant 35−40
−644%
260−270
+644%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1733%
55
+1733%
Dead Island 2 7−8
−1200%
90−95
+1200%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1550%
99
+1550%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−1425%
120−130
+1425%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1540%
80−85
+1540%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7−8
−1500%
110−120
+1500%

4K
High Preset

Dead Island 2 5−6
−720%
40−45
+720%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−519%
99
+519%
Valorant 16−18
−1388%
250−260
+1388%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2500%
26
+2500%
Dead Island 2 5−6
−720%
40−45
+720%
Dota 2 10−12
−609%
78
+609%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−3300%
68
+3300%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2600%
80−85
+2600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−1375%
55−60
+1375%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−1300%
55−60
+1300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
+0%
72
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

This is how GeForce MX110 and RX 6850M XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6850M XT is 661% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6850M XT is 1317% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6850M XT is 1325% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6850M XT is 5700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6850M XT is ahead in 60 tests (91%)
  • there's a draw in 6 tests (9%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.51 42.97
Recency 17 November 2017 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 165 Watt

GeForce MX110 has 450% lower power consumption.

RX 6850M XT, on the other hand, has a 1124.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6850M XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX110 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GeForce MX110
AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
Radeon RX 6850M XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 2418 votes

Rate GeForce MX110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 243 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6850M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX110 or Radeon RX 6850M XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.