GeForce GT 610 vs MX110

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX110 with GeForce GT 610, including specs and performance data.

GeForce MX110
2018
2 GB DDR3, GDDR5, 30 Watt
3.73
+366%

GeForce MX110 outperforms GT 610 by a whopping 366% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking6691108
Place by popularity8497
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.870.01
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameN16V-GMR1GF119
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 January 2018 (6 years ago)2 April 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$39.99
Current price$1057 $98 (2.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GeForce MX110 has 8600% better value for money than GT 610.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25648
CUDA coresno data48
Core clock speed965 MHz810 MHz
Boost clock speed993 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data292 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt29 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data102 °C
Texture fill rate23.836.5 billion/sec
Floating-point performance762.6 gflops155.5 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce MX110 and GeForce GT 610 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportno dataPCI Express 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data5.7" (14.5 cm)
Heightno data2.7" (6.9 cm)
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3, GDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1024 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz1.8 GB/s
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMIno data+
HDCPno data+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Rayno data+
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.2
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX110 3.73
+366%
GT 610 0.80

MX110 outperforms GT 610 by 366% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GeForce MX110 1440
+368%
GT 610 308

MX110 outperforms GT 610 by 368% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GeForce MX110 1714
+363%
GT 610 370

MX110 outperforms GT 610 by 363% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GeForce MX110 4219
+229%
GT 610 1281

MX110 outperforms GT 610 by 229% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD19
+375%
4−5
−375%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+329%
7−8
−329%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+344%
9
−344%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+338%
8−9
−338%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+338%
8
−338%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+329%
7−8
−329%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+350%
10
−350%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+350%
10−11
−350%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+338%
16
−338%
Hitman 3 30−33
+329%
7−8
−329%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+341%
17
−341%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+362%
13
−362%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+362%
13
−362%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+364%
14−16
−364%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+347%
18−20
−347%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
+329%
7−8
−329%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+338%
8−9
−338%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+338%
8−9
−338%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+329%
7−8
−329%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+338%
8
−338%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+350%
10−11
−350%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+341%
16−18
−341%
Hitman 3 30−33
+329%
7−8
−329%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+352%
21−24
−352%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+344%
9−10
−344%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+364%
14−16
−364%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+344%
9
−344%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+347%
18−20
−347%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
+329%
7−8
−329%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+338%
8−9
−338%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+329%
7−8
−329%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+350%
6
−350%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+341%
16−18
−341%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+352%
21−24
−352%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+364%
14−16
−364%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+320%
5
−320%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+347%
18−20
−347%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+344%
9−10
−344%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
+329%
7−8
−329%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+350%
6−7
−350%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+350%
6−7
−350%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+350%
6−7
−350%
Hitman 3 35−40
+338%
8−9
−338%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+344%
9−10
−344%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+329%
7−8
−329%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+350%
6−7
−350%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%

This is how GeForce MX110 and GT 610 compete in popular games:

  • GeForce MX110 is 375% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.73 0.80
Recency 1 January 2018 2 April 2012
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1024 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 29 Watt

The GeForce MX110 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 610 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce MX110 is a notebook card while GeForce GT 610 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GeForce MX110
NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
GeForce GT 610

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 2151 vote

Rate GeForce MX110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 1667 votes

Rate GeForce GT 610 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.