Radeon RX 6400 vs GeForce Go 7950 GTX

Place in performance ranking	1137	269
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	12.35
Architecture	G7x (2005−2007)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2022)
GPU code name	G71M	Navi 24
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	12 October 2006 (17 years ago)	19 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$159
Current price	no data	$376 (2.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	32	768
Core clock speed	8 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	575 MHz	2321 MHz
Number of transistors	278 million	5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	90 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	53 Watt
Texture fill rate	13.80	111.4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce Go 7950 GTX and Radeon RX 6400 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-III	PCIe 4.0 x4
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1400 MHz	16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	44.8 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	9.0c (9_3)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	3.0	6.6
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	2.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Go 7950 GTX 0.68

RX 6400 19.53
+2772%

Radeon RX 6400 outperforms GeForce Go 7950 GTX by 2772% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Go 7950 GTX 263

RX 6400 7548
+2770%

Radeon RX 6400 outperforms GeForce Go 7950 GTX by 2770% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−2733%

85−90
+2733%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −2650%	55−60 +2650%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2733%	85−90 +2733%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −2700%	140−150 +2700%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −2733%	85−90 +2733%
Hitman 3	3−4 −2733%	85−90 +2733%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −2627%	300−310 +2627%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −2650%	220−230 +2650%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −2650%	55−60 +2650%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2733%	85−90 +2733%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −2700%	140−150 +2700%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −2733%	85−90 +2733%
Hitman 3	3−4 −2733%	85−90 +2733%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −2627%	300−310 +2627%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −2650%	220−230 +2650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −2733%	85−90 +2733%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −2650%	55−60 +2650%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2733%	85−90 +2733%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −2700%	140−150 +2700%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −2733%	85−90 +2733%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −2627%	300−310 +2627%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −2733%	85−90 +2733%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −2650%	110−120 +2650%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −2600%	27−30 +2600%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −2600%	27−30 +2600%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −2650%	110−120 +2650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −2600%	27−30 +2600%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	5−6 −2700%	140−150 +2700%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −2600%	27−30 +2600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −2600%	27−30 +2600%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −2650%	110−120 +2650%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−2650%

55−60
+2650%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.68	19.53
Recency	12 October 2006	19 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	4 GB
Chip lithography	90 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	53 Watt