GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Go 7400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce Go 7400 and GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Go 7400
2006
128 MB GDDR3
0.17

RTX 2050 Mobile outperforms Go 7400 by a whopping 10912% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1414297
Place by popularitynot in top-10017
Power efficiencyno data28.70
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameG72GA107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 February 2006 (18 years ago)17 December 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores72048
Core clock speed450 MHz1185 MHz
Boost clock speed450 MHz1477 MHz
Number of transistors112 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data45 Watt
Texture fill rate1.80094.53
Floating-point processing powerno data6.05 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs464
Tensor Coresno data256
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed450 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth7.2 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.6
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−142
1440p-0−133
4K-0−125

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−350%
36
+350%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2350%
49
+2350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−275%
30
+275%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−950%
21
+950%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1420%
76
+1420%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1000%
40−45
+1000%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−238%
27
+238%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−650%
15
+650%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1067%
70
+1067%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1160%
63
+1160%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−2460%
120−130
+2460%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1000%
40−45
+1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1350%
55−60
+1350%
World of Tanks 10−11
−2130%
220−230
+2130%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−313%
30−35
+313%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−550%
13
+550%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−967%
60−65
+967%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1020%
56
+1020%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−2460%
120−130
+2460%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−16600%
160−170
+16600%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1125%
45−50
+1125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−2400%
24−27
+2400%
Valorant 4−5
−1100%
45−50
+1100%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 14−16
−113%
30−35
+113%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−113%
30−35
+113%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 55−60
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−113%
30−35
+113%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 18−20
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Dota 2 14−16
−127%
34
+127%
Valorant 0−1 21−24

Full HD
Low Preset

Elden Ring 43
+0%
43
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 87
+0%
87
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Dota 2 85
+0%
85
+0%
Elden Ring 59
+0%
59
+0%
Fortnite 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 69
+0%
69
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 43
+0%
43
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Dota 2 110
+0%
110
+0%
Valorant 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 37
+0%
37
+0%
Elden Ring 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+0%
37
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
World of Tanks 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 47
+0%
47
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Elden Ring 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2050 Mobile is 16600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 2050 Mobile is ahead in 30 tests (50%)
  • there's a draw in 30 tests (50%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.17 18.72
Recency 1 February 2006 17 December 2021
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 8 nm

RTX 2050 Mobile has a 10911.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7400 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400
GeForce Go 7400
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 7 votes

Rate GeForce Go 7400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 2321 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.