Radeon RX 6700 XT vs GeForce Go 6800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce Go 6800 with Radeon RX 6700 XT, including specs and performance data.

Go 6800
2004
256 MB GDDR3, 45 Watt
0.28

RX 6700 XT outperforms Go 6800 by a whopping 18311% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking134649
Place by popularitynot in top-10077
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data57.46
Power efficiency0.4315.38
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNV41Navi 22
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date8 November 2004 (20 years ago)3 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$479

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores172560
Core clock speed300 MHz2321 MHz
Boost clock speed300 MHz2581 MHz
Number of transistors190 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate3.600413.0
Floating-point processing powerno data13.21 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs12160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-IIIPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed550 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth35.2 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.5
OpenGL2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)4.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Go 6800 0.28
RX 6700 XT 51.55
+18311%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 6800 106
RX 6700 XT 19867
+18642%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−1158
1440p-0−186
4K-0−151

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.03
1440pno data5.57
4Kno data9.39

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−5850%
119
+5850%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−3500%
100−110
+3500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−4900%
100−105
+4900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4850%
99
+4850%
Hitman 3 4−5
−3350%
138
+3350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−2413%
200−210
+2413%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−4925%
200−210
+4925%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−411%
140−150
+411%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−3500%
100−110
+3500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−4900%
100−105
+4900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4400%
90
+4400%
Hitman 3 4−5
−3300%
136
+3300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−2413%
200−210
+2413%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−6925%
281
+6925%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1089%
100−110
+1089%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−411%
140−150
+411%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−3500%
100−110
+3500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−4900%
100−105
+4900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4150%
85
+4150%
Hitman 3 4−5
−3275%
135
+3275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−2313%
193
+2313%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−5900%
240
+5900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1311%
127
+1311%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−200%
84
+200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 56
Hitman 3 6−7
−1283%
83
+1283%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−7150%
145
+7150%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4350%
85−90
+4350%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−3700%
35−40
+3700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 48

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2350%
45−50
+2350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 169
+0%
169
+0%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 144
+0%
144
+0%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 125
+0%
125
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 109
+0%
109
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Metro Exodus 123
+0%
123
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 173
+0%
173
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Hitman 3 48
+0%
48
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74
+0%
74
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+0%
25
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 93
+0%
93
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35
+0%
35
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6700 XT is 7150% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6700 XT is ahead in 29 tests (41%)
  • there's a draw in 41 test (59%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.28 51.55
Recency 8 November 2004 3 March 2021
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 230 Watt

Go 6800 has 411.1% lower power consumption.

RX 6700 XT, on the other hand, has a 18310.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1757.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 6800 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce Go 6800 is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6700 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800
GeForce Go 6800
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
Radeon RX 6700 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 6722 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.