GeForce RTX 2080 Ti vs Go 6800

Place in the ranking	1347	45
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	21.76
Power efficiency	0.43	15.56
Architecture	Curie (2003−2013)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	NV41	TU102
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	8 November 2004 (20 years ago)	20 September 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	17	4352
Core clock speed	300 MHz	1350 MHz
Boost clock speed	300 MHz	1545 MHz
Number of transistors	190 million	18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	130 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	3.600	420.2
Floating-point processing power	no data	13.45 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	88
TMUs	12	272
Tensor Cores	no data	544
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	68

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-III	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	11 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	352 Bit
Memory clock speed	550 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	35.2 GB/s	616.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	-	+
G-SYNC support	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	9.0c (9_3)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	3.0	6.5
OpenGL	2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Go 6800 0.28

RTX 2080 Ti 56.41
+20046%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 6800 106

RTX 2080 Ti 21679
+20352%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	0−1	165
1440p	0−1	122
4K	-0−1	93

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	6.05
1440p	no data	8.19
4K	no data	10.74

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −2050%	120−130 +2050%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −4133%	120−130 +4133%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −2050%	120−130 +2050%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1800%	57 +1800%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −5900%	300−310 +5900%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −2550%	106 +2550%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −2050%	120−130 +2050%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1700%	54 +1700%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −1433%	92 +1433%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −5900%	300−310 +5900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	6−7 −4050%	249 +4050%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −2150%	90 +2150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −4250%	170−180 +4250%
World of Tanks	12−14 −2225%	270−280 +2225%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −2050%	120−130 +2050%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1500%	48 +1500%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −1817%	110−120 +1817%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −5900%	300−310 +5900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	6−7 −2950%	183 +2950%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

2−3

−8650%

170−180
+8650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −119%	65−70 +119%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −967%	32 +967%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −3900%	160−170 +3900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −2750%	110−120 +2750%
Valorant	4−5 −5000%	204 +5000%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −847%	142 +847%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −847%	142 +847%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	1−2 −20800%	209 +20800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −847%	142 +847%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	62
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −700%	16 +700%
Dota 2	14−16 −827%	139 +827%
Valorant	0−1	113

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	85 +0%	85 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Metro Exodus	110 +0%	110 +0%
Valorant	290 +0%	290 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	235 +0%	235 +0%
Dota 2	138 +0%	138 +0%
Fortnite	224 +0%	224 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	134 +0%	134 +0%
Metro Exodus	100 +0%	100 +0%
Valorant	170 +0%	170 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	74 +0%	74 +0%
Dota 2	141 +0%	141 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Valorant	259 +0%	259 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	63 +0%	63 +0%
World of Tanks	350−400 +0%	350−400 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	74 +0%	74 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 +0%	180−190 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	100−105 +0%	100−105 +0%
Metro Exodus	98 +0%	98 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Metro Exodus	51 +0%	51 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	42 +0%	42 +0%
World of Tanks	270 +0%	270 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Far Cry 5	105 +0%	105 +0%
Fortnite	96 +0%	96 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2080 Ti is 20800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 2080 Ti is ahead in 31 test (49%)
there's a draw in 32 tests (51%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.28	56.41
Recency	8 November 2004	20 September 2018
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	11 GB
Chip lithography	130 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	250 Watt

Go 6800 has 455.6% lower power consumption.

RTX 2080 Ti, on the other hand, has a 20046.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 4300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 983.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 6800 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce Go 6800 is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.