Quadro T1200 Mobile vs GeForce Go 6800 Ultra

Go 6100 Go 6100 + nForce Go 430 Go 6150 Go 6150 + nForce Go 430 Go 6200 Go 6200 TE Go 6250 Go 6400 Go 6600 Go 6600 NPB 128M Go 6600 TE Go 6800 Go 6800 Ultra
VS
Quadro T400 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce Go 6800 Ultra with Quadro T1200 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Go 6800 Ultra
2005
256 MB GDDR3, 89 Watt
0.31

T1200 Mobile outperforms Go 6800 Ultra by a whopping 5287% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Go 6800 Ultra Go 6800 Ultra
T1200 Mobile Quadro T1200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1304305
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.2873.59
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNV41TU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date24 February 2005 (20 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores171024
Core clock speed450 MHz855 MHz
Boost clock speed450 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistors190 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate5.40091.20
Floating-point processing powerno data2.918 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs1264

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.6
OpenGL2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)4.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−5700%
58
+5700%
1440p0−133
4K1−2
−8000%
81
+8000%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−4900%
100−105
+4900%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4900%
50−55
+4900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−4900%
100−105
+4900%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4900%
50−55
+4900%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2367%
70−75
+2367%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−871%
65−70
+871%
Valorant 24−27
−435%
130−140
+435%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−4900%
100−105
+4900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−1500%
220−230
+1500%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4900%
50−55
+4900%
Dota 2 10−11
−1040%
114
+1040%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2367%
70−75
+2367%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−871%
65−70
+871%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−2267%
71
+2267%
Valorant 24−27
−435%
130−140
+435%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4900%
50−55
+4900%
Dota 2 10−11
−970%
107
+970%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2367%
70−75
+2367%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−871%
65−70
+871%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−1133%
37
+1133%
Valorant 24−27
−5285%
1400−1450
+5285%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−5233%
160−170
+5233%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−4500%
45−50
+4500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 40−45

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−120%
30−35
+120%
Valorant 2−3
−5050%
100−110
+5050%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
−1900%
20−22
+1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 65
+0%
65
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 71
+0%
71
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 56
+0%
56
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+0%
37
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 41
+0%
41
+0%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 109
+0%
109
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

This is how Go 6800 Ultra and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 5700% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 8000% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the T1200 Mobile is 5050% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is ahead in 19 tests (43%)
  • there's a draw in 25 tests (57%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.31 16.70
Recency 24 February 2005 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 18 Watt

T1200 Mobile has a 5287.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 983.3% more advanced lithography process, and 394.4% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 6800 Ultra in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce Go 6800 Ultra is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra
GeForce Go 6800 Ultra
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Go 6800 Ultra GeForce Go 6800 Ultra
vs
ATI Mobility HD 3650 Mobility Radeon HD 3650
T1200 Mobile Quadro T1200 Mobile
vs
Pro 580X Radeon Pro 580X
Go 6800 Ultra GeForce Go 6800 Ultra
vs
9600M GT GeForce 9600M GT
HD 6470M AMD HD 6470M
vs
RTX 4070 4070
HD 6470M AMD HD 6470M
vs
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 3050 6GB Mobile
HD 6470M AMD HD 6470M
vs
RTX 5060 Mobile 5060 Mobile
GT 320M NVIDIA GT 320M
vs
GT 230M 230M
ATI Mobility X1800 Mobility Radeon X1800
vs
RTX 2070 Super 2070 Super
9600M GS GeForce 9600M GS
vs
RX Vega Mobile Vega Mobile
GT 415M NVIDIA GT 415M
vs
RX 7600M XT 7600M XT
GT 415M NVIDIA GT 415M
vs
Radeon 890M 890M
GeForce 410M GeForce 410M
vs
7800 GTX 7800 GTX
GeForce 410M GeForce 410M
vs
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 3050 6GB Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 4 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6800 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 146 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 6800 Ultra or Quadro T1200 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.