Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 vs GeForce Go 6600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce Go 6600 and Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Go 6600
2005
256 MB DDR
0.18

RX Vega M GL / 870 outperforms Go 6600 by a whopping 7611% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1405374
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data14.70
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code nameNV43 A2Vega Kaby Lake-G
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date29 September 2005 (19 years ago)7 January 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores121280
Core clock speed300 MHz931 MHz
Boost clock speed375 MHz1011 MHz
Number of transistors146 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology110 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data65 Watt
Texture fill rate2.400no data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfaceMXM-IIno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRHBM2
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed350 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12_1
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.1no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−144
1440p-0−128
4K-0−115

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1000%
21−24
+1000%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1467%
47
+1467%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1550%
33
+1550%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1000%
21−24
+1000%
Hitman 3 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−813%
70−75
+813%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−1050%
45−50
+1050%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−171%
75−80
+171%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1000%
30−35
+1000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1400%
30
+1400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1000%
21−24
+1000%
Hitman 3 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−813%
70−75
+813%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−1050%
45−50
+1050%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−278%
30−35
+278%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−171%
75−80
+171%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−667%
23
+667%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−900%
20
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1000%
21−24
+1000%
Hitman 3 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−813%
70−75
+813%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−1050%
45−50
+1050%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−167%
24
+167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−171%
75−80
+171%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 7−8
Hitman 3 6−7
−183%
16−18
+183%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−1350%
27−30
+1350%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−950%
21
+950%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−1000%
11
+1000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 7−8

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−400%
10
+400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Metro Exodus 53
+0%
53
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 48
+0%
48
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Metro Exodus 41
+0%
41
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 37
+0%
37
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 32
+0%
32
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 17
+0%
17
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12
+0%
12
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Metro Exodus 27
+0%
27
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Hitman 3 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Metro Exodus 15
+0%
15
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+0%
14
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4
+0%
4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX Vega M GL / 870 is 1550% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega M GL / 870 is ahead in 29 tests (41%)
  • there's a draw in 41 test (59%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.18 13.88
Recency 29 September 2005 7 January 2018
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 14 nm

RX Vega M GL / 870 has a 7611.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 685.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 6600 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 6600
GeForce Go 6600
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 5 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 118 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.