ATI Radeon IGP 345M vs GeForce Go 6600

#ad 
Buy
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14161542
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameNV43 A2RS200
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date29 September 2005 (19 years ago)5 October 2002 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12no data
Core clock speed300 MHz183 MHz
Boost clock speed375 MHzno data
Number of transistors146 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm180 nm
Texture fill rate2.4000.37
ROPs42
TMUs82

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIAGP 4x
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed350 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)7.0
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.11.4
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 6600 69
+3350%
ATI IGP 345M 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 no data
Valorant 24−27 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−12 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Dota 2 9−10 no data
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 no data
Valorant 24−27 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Dota 2 9−10 no data
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 no data
Valorant 24−27 no data

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 0−1 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 no data

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Valorant 1−2 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 September 2005 5 October 2002
Chip lithography 110 nm 180 nm

Go 6600 has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 63.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 6600 and Radeon IGP 345M. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 6600
GeForce Go 6600
ATI Radeon IGP 345M
Radeon IGP 345M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 5 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 345M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 6600 or Radeon IGP 345M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.