ATI Radeon 9600 PRO vs GeForce Go 6100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce Go 6100 with Radeon 9600 PRO, including specs and performance data.

Go 6100
2006
0.04

9600 PRO outperforms Go 6100 by a whopping 150% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking15451509
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.43
Architectureno dataR300 (2003−2008)
GPU code nameC51MVRV350
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 February 2006 (19 years ago)1 October 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3no data
Core clock speed1 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed425 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data60 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data18 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1.600
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeshared MemoryDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data128 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data300 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data9.6 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXshared Memory9.0 (9_0)
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Go 6100 0.04
ATI 9600 PRO 0.10
+150%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 6100 17
Samples: 88
ATI 9600 PRO 42
+147%
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Valorant 21−24
−139%
55−60
+139%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Valorant 21−24
−139%
55−60
+139%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Valorant 21−24
−139%
55−60
+139%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Escape from Tarkov 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
Valorant 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.04 0.10
Recency 1 February 2006 1 October 2003
Chip lithography 110 nm 130 nm

Go 6100 has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9600 PRO, on the other hand, has a 150% higher aggregate performance score.

The Radeon 9600 PRO is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 6100 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce Go 6100 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9600 PRO is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 6100
GeForce Go 6100
ATI Radeon 9600 PRO
Radeon 9600 PRO

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 19 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 78 votes

Rate Radeon 9600 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 6100 or Radeon 9600 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.