Radeon R7 250 OEM vs GeForce GTX TITAN

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking255not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.25no data
Power efficiency5.92no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameGK110Oland
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date19 February 2013 (11 years ago)8 October 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2688384
Core clock speed837 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed876 MHz1050 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate196.225.20
Floating-point processing power4.709 TFLOPS0.8064 TFLOPS
ROPs488
TMUs22424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount6 GB2 GB
Memory bus width384-bit GDDR5128 Bit
Memory clock speed6.0 GB/s1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/s32 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI++
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
3D Vision Live+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 February 2013 8 October 2013
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 65 Watt

GTX TITAN has a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

R7 250 OEM, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, and 284.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX TITAN and Radeon R7 250 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
GeForce GTX TITAN
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM
Radeon R7 250 OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 159 votes

Rate GeForce GTX TITAN on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 51 vote

Rate Radeon R7 250 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.