GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile vs GTX TITAN

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GT 640 GT 740 GTX 650 GTX 650 Ti GTX 660 GTX 660 Ti GTX 670 GTX 680 GTX 760 GTX 770 GTX 780 GTX 780 Ti
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
2050 Max-Q 2050 Mobile 2060 Mobile 2060 Max-Q 2060 Max-Q Refresh 2060 Mobile Refresh 2060 SUPER Mobile 2070 Mobile 2070 Max-Q 2070 Max-Q Refresh 2070 Mobile Refresh 2070 Super Max-Q 2070 Super Mobile 2080 Mobile 2080 Max-Q 2080 Super Max-Q 2080 Super Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX TITAN with GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GTX TITAN
2013, $999
6 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
19.31

RTX 2080 Super Mobile outperforms TITAN by an impressive 88% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX TITAN GTX TITAN
RTX 2080 Super Mobile RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking311145
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.84no data
Power efficiency6.0118.87
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGK110TU104
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date19 February 2013 (12 years ago)2 April 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores26883072
Core clock speed837 MHz1365 MHz
Boost clock speed876 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate196.2299.5
Floating-point processing power4.709 TFLOPS9.585 TFLOPS
ROPs4864
TMUs224192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Coresno data48
L1 Cache224 KB3 MB
L2 Cache1536 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB8 GB
Memory bus width384-bit GDDR5256 Bit
Memory clock speed6.0 GB/s1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPortNo outputs
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support-+
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
3D Vision Live+-
VR Readyno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.140
CUDA+7.5
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX TITAN 19.31
RTX 2080 Super Mobile 36.37
+88.3%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX TITAN 10470
RTX 2080 Super Mobile 24960
+138%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD70−75
−95.7%
137
+95.7%
1440p50−55
−90%
95
+90%
4K30−35
−117%
65
+117%

Cost per frame, $

1080p14.27no data
1440p19.98no data
4K33.30no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 169
+0%
169
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 121
+0%
121
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Fortnite 178
+0%
178
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 161
+0%
161
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Dota 2 153
+0%
153
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 121
+0%
121
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Fortnite 171
+0%
171
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 136
+0%
136
+0%
Metro Exodus 92
+0%
92
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 198
+0%
198
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 147
+0%
147
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Dota 2 141
+0%
141
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 121
+0%
121
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103
+0%
103
+0%
Valorant 205
+0%
205
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 136
+0%
136
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 90
+0%
90
+0%
Metro Exodus 55
+0%
55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 121
+0%
121
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 102
+0%
102
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 104
+0%
104
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 97
+0%
97
+0%
Metro Exodus 35
+0%
35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 76
+0%
76
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 72
+0%
72
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Dota 2 141
+0%
141
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 50
+0%
50
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 52
+0%
52
+0%

This is how GTX TITAN and RTX 2080 Super Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2080 Super Mobile is 96% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2080 Super Mobile is 90% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2080 Super Mobile is 117% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 19.31 36.37
Recency 19 February 2013 2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 150 Watt

RTX 2080 Super Mobile has a 88.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX TITAN in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX TITAN is a desktop graphics card while GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
GeForce GTX TITAN
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX TITAN GeForce GTX TITAN
vs
RX 470 Radeon RX 470
RTX 2080 Super Mobile GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
vs
RX 7700S Radeon RX 7700S
GTX TITAN GeForce GTX TITAN
vs
R9 290 Radeon R9 290
GTX 650 Ti Boost GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
vs
Quadro K600 Quadro K600
GTX 650 Ti Boost GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
vs
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
GTX TITAN GeForce GTX TITAN
vs
GT 430 GT 430
RTX 2080 Max-Q RTX 2080 Max-Q
vs
GTX TITAN TITAN
RTX 2070 Max-Q RTX 2070 Max-Q
vs
GTX TITAN TITAN
RTX 2080 Super Max-Q RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
vs
GTX TITAN TITAN
RTX 2070 Super Max-Q RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
vs
GTX TITAN TITAN
RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh
vs
GTX TITAN TITAN
RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh
vs
GTX TITAN TITAN
RTX 2060 Max-Q Refresh RTX 2060 Max-Q Refresh
vs
GTX TITAN TITAN

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 180 votes

Rate GeForce GTX TITAN on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 135 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX TITAN or GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.