Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) vs GeForce GTX TITAN X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
750 GM206 750 v2 950 950 Low Power 950 OEM 960 960 OEM 970 980 980 Ti TITAN X Tegra X1
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
R1E Mobile Graphics R2 Mobile Graphics R2E Mobile Graphics R3 Mobile Graphics R3E Mobile Graphics R4 (Beema) R4E Mobile Graphics R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) R5E Mobile Graphics

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX TITAN X with Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), including specs and performance data.

GTX TITAN X
2015, $999
12 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
30.08
+2938%

TITAN X outperforms R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) by a whopping 2938% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX TITAN X GTX TITAN X
R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2121161
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.79no data
Power efficiency9.26no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)GCN 1.1 (2014)
GPU code nameGM200Beema
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date17 March 2015 (11 years ago)29 April 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072128
Core clock speed1000 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1075 MHz850 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Texture fill rate209.1no data
Floating-point processing power6.691 TFLOPSno data
ROPs96no data
TMUs192no data
L1 Cache1.1 MBno data
L2 Cache3 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data
SLI options4x-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount12 GBno data
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/sno data
Memory bandwidth336.5 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2no data
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (FL 12_0)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA5.2-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD180−190
+2900%
6
−2900%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.55no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how GTX TITAN X and R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) compete in popular games:

  • GTX TITAN X is 2900% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 38 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 30.08 0.99
Recency 17 March 2015 29 April 2014

GTX TITAN X has a 2938% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 10 months.

The GeForce GTX TITAN X is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX TITAN X is a desktop graphics card while Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX TITAN X GeForce GTX TITAN X
vs
RTX 3050 8 GB GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)
vs
GeForce 810M GeForce 810M
GTX TITAN X GeForce GTX TITAN X
vs
Arc A750 Arc A750
GT 730 OEM GT 730 OEM
vs
GTX 1660 GTX 1660
GT 730 OEM GT 730 OEM
vs
Jetson AGX Xavier 16 GB Jetson AGX Xavier 16 GB
GT 730 OEM GT 730 OEM
vs
RX 9070 GRE RX 9070 GRE
GT 730 OEM GT 730 OEM
vs
Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) Graphics 3 Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
GT 730 OEM GT 730 OEM
vs
Graphics 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU Graphics 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
GTX TITAN X GTX TITAN X
vs
R9 380 R9 380
GTX TITAN X TITAN X
vs
GTX 550 Ti 550 Ti
GTX TITAN X TITAN X
vs
GTX 760 X2 760 X2
GTX TITAN X GTX TITAN X
vs
HD 6770M Mac Edition HD 6770M Mac Edition
GTX TITAN X GTX TITAN X
vs
HD 6610M HD 6610M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 303 votes

Rate GeForce GTX TITAN X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 21 votes

Rate Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX TITAN X or Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.