RTX A2000 Mobile vs GeForce GTX TITAN X

Place in performance ranking	145	194
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	15.67	no data
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	GM200	GA107
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	17 March 2015 (9 years ago)	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$999	no data
Current price	$290 (0.3x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3072	2560
CUDA cores	3072	no data
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	893 MHz
Boost clock speed	1075 MHz	1687 MHz
Number of transistors	8,000 million	13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	192 billion/sec	108.6
Floating-point performance	6,691 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX TITAN X and RTX A2000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	10.5" (26.7 cm)	no data
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Recommended system power (PSU)	600 Watt	no data
Supplementary power connectors	6-pin + 8-pin	no data
SLI options	4x	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7.0 GB/s	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	336.5 GB/s	176.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2	No outputs
Multi monitor support	4 displays	no data
HDMI	+	no data
HDCP	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream	+	no data
GeForce ShadowPlay	+	no data
GPU Boost	2.0	no data
GameWorks	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2
CUDA	+	8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	100−110 +28.2%	78 −28.2%
1440p	50−55 +22%	41 −22%
4K	50−55 +25%	40 −25%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

95−100
+28.4%

−28.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 +22.4%	45−50 −22.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	70−75 +27.3%	55 −27.3%
Battlefield 5	110−120 +31%	80−85 −31%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 +25%	50−55 −25%
Cyberpunk 2077	80−85 +29%	62 −29%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +27.1%	55−60 −27.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	85−90 +26.9%	65−70 −26.9%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +27.3%	110−120 −27.3%
Hitman 3	65−70 +25%	50−55 −25%
Horizon Zero Dawn	130−140 +28.7%	100−110 −28.7%
Metro Exodus	100−105 +20.5%	80−85 −20.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	85−90 +25%	65−70 −25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	170−180 +25.9%	135 −25.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85 +29%	62 −29%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 +22.4%	45−50 −22.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50−55 +28.2%	39 −28.2%
Battlefield 5	110−120 +31%	80−85 −31%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 +25%	50−55 −25%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 +30%	50 −30%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +27.1%	55−60 −27.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	85−90 +26.9%	65−70 −26.9%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +27.3%	110−120 −27.3%
Hitman 3	40−45 +25%	32 −25%
Horizon Zero Dawn	130−140 +28.7%	100−110 −28.7%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +25%	36 −25%
Red Dead Redemption 2	85−90 +25%	65−70 −25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	140−150 +29.6%	108 −29.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	120−130 +25%	96 −25%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 +25%	70−75 −25%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 +22.4%	45−50 −22.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +25%	32 −25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 +25%	50−55 −25%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +22%	41 −22%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +27.1%	55−60 −27.1%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +27.3%	110−120 −27.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	130−140 +28.7%	100−110 −28.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	120−130 +27.7%	94 −27.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	65−70 +30%	50 −30%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +20.7%	29 −20.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

85−90
+25%

65−70

−25%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +22.4%	45−50 −22.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	70−75 +27.3%	55−60 −27.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +29.6%	27−30 −29.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +29.6%	27 −29.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +28.6%	35−40 −28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 +20%	25 −20%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +22.6%	53 −22.6%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +27.5%	50−55 −27.5%
Hitman 3	40−45 +29%	30−35 −29%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 +22.6%	50−55 −22.6%
Metro Exodus	60−65 +22.4%	49 −22.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80−85 +27%	63 −27%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +25%	30−35 −25%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +20%	20 −20%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

55−60
+27.9%

40−45

−27.9%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−33 +20%	24−27 −20%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +20%	20−22 −20%
Hitman 3	24−27 +20%	20−22 −20%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +16.7%	30−33 −16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +23.5%	17 −23.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +21.2%	33 −21.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +31.3%	16−18 −31.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +28.6%	14−16 −28.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +20%	14−16 −20%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +28.6%	14−16 −28.6%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +28.6%	35−40 −28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +16.7%	30−33 −16.7%
Metro Exodus	30−33 +20%	24−27 −20%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 +27.3%	10−12 −27.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

27−30
+22.7%

21−24

−22.7%

This is how GTX TITAN X and RTX A2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

GTX TITAN X is 28% faster in 1080p
GTX TITAN X is 22% faster in 1440p
GTX TITAN X is 25% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	33.68	25.56
Recency	17 March 2015	12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	95 Watt