Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs GeForce GTX 980M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 980M and Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
GTX 980M outperforms R9 M295X Mac Edition by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 332 | 421 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 13.34 | 3.75 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) |
| GPU code name | GM204 | Amethyst |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 7 October 2014 (10 years ago) | 23 November 2014 (10 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1536 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 1038 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1127 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 5,200 million | 5,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | unknown | 250 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 51.84 | 108.8 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.659 TFLOPS | 3.482 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 32 |
| TMUs | 96 | 128 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | no data |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
| SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 1362 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 174.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| VGA аnalog display support | + | no data |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | no data |
| HDMI | + | - |
| G-SYNC support | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| GameStream | + | - |
| GeForce ShadowPlay | + | - |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | no data |
| GameWorks | + | - |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | - |
| Optimus | + | - |
| BatteryBoost | + | - |
| Ansel | + | - |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| 900p | 173
+44.2%
| 120−130
−44.2%
|
| Full HD | 72
+44%
| 50−55
−44%
|
| 1440p | 36
+50%
| 24−27
−50%
|
| 4K | 28
+55.6%
| 18−20
−55.6%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 100−110
+44.3%
|
70−75
−44.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+58.3%
|
24−27
−58.3%
|
| Sons of the Forest | 35−40
+54.2%
|
24−27
−54.2%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 82
+49.1%
|
55−60
−49.1%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 100−110
+44.3%
|
70−75
−44.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+58.3%
|
24−27
−58.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 58
+45%
|
40−45
−45%
|
| Fortnite | 178
+48.3%
|
120−130
−48.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 74
+48%
|
50−55
−48%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 55−60
+60%
|
35−40
−60%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 85
+54.5%
|
55−60
−54.5%
|
| Sons of the Forest | 35−40
+54.2%
|
24−27
−54.2%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
+45.3%
|
95−100
−45.3%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 68
+51.1%
|
45−50
−51.1%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 100−110
+44.3%
|
70−75
−44.3%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 230
+43.8%
|
160−170
−43.8%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+58.3%
|
24−27
−58.3%
|
| Dota 2 | 100−110
+50%
|
70−75
−50%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 53
+51.4%
|
35−40
−51.4%
|
| Fortnite | 86
+43.3%
|
60−65
−43.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 68
+51.1%
|
45−50
−51.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 55−60
+60%
|
35−40
−60%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 60
+50%
|
40−45
−50%
|
| Metro Exodus | 31
+47.6%
|
21−24
−47.6%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 79
+43.6%
|
55−60
−43.6%
|
| Sons of the Forest | 35−40
+54.2%
|
24−27
−54.2%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 61
+52.5%
|
40−45
−52.5%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
+45.3%
|
95−100
−45.3%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 61
+52.5%
|
40−45
−52.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+58.3%
|
24−27
−58.3%
|
| Dota 2 | 100−110
+50%
|
70−75
−50%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 50
+42.9%
|
35−40
−42.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 47
+56.7%
|
30−33
−56.7%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 49
+63.3%
|
30−33
−63.3%
|
| Sons of the Forest | 35−40
+54.2%
|
24−27
−54.2%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 33
+57.1%
|
21−24
−57.1%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
+45.3%
|
95−100
−45.3%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 63
+57.5%
|
40−45
−57.5%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 35−40
+50%
|
24−27
−50%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 130−140
+44.4%
|
90−95
−44.4%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 30−33
+42.9%
|
21−24
−42.9%
|
| Metro Exodus | 19
+58.3%
|
12−14
−58.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 160−170
+51.8%
|
110−120
−51.8%
|
| Valorant | 170−180
+42.5%
|
120−130
−42.5%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 45
+50%
|
30−33
−50%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+60%
|
10−11
−60%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 34
+61.9%
|
21−24
−61.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 39
+44.4%
|
27−30
−44.4%
|
| Sons of the Forest | 21−24
+43.8%
|
16−18
−43.8%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
+50%
|
18−20
−50%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 40
+48.1%
|
27−30
−48.1%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16
+50%
|
10−11
−50%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 41
+51.9%
|
27−30
−51.9%
|
| Metro Exodus | 12
+50%
|
8−9
−50%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 22
+57.1%
|
14−16
−57.1%
|
| Valorant | 100−110
+44.3%
|
70−75
−44.3%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 23
+43.8%
|
16−18
−43.8%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16
+50%
|
10−11
−50%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
+75%
|
4−5
−75%
|
| Dota 2 | 60−65
+55%
|
40−45
−55%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 16
+60%
|
10−11
−60%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 26
+44.4%
|
18−20
−44.4%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 17
+70%
|
10−11
−70%
|
| Sons of the Forest | 12−14
+44.4%
|
9−10
−44.4%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 19
+58.3%
|
12−14
−58.3%
|
This is how GTX 980M and R9 M295X Mac Edition compete in popular games:
- GTX 980M is 44% faster in 900p
- GTX 980M is 44% faster in 1080p
- GTX 980M is 50% faster in 1440p
- GTX 980M is 56% faster in 4K
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 17.51 | 12.32 |
| Recency | 7 October 2014 | 23 November 2014 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
GTX 980M has a 42.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.
R9 M295X Mac Edition, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 month.
The GeForce GTX 980M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
