Radeon HD 3870 vs GeForce GTX 980M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 980M with Radeon HD 3870, including specs and performance data.

GTX 980M
2014
8 GB GDDR5
19.03
+1222%

GTX 980M outperforms ATI HD 3870 by a whopping 1222% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking275949
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.960.03
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGM204RV670
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 October 2014 (9 years ago)19 November 2007 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$269
Current price$583 $195 (0.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 980M has 33100% better value for money than ATI HD 3870.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536320
CUDA cores1536no data
Core clock speed1038 MHz777 MHz
Boost clock speed1127 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,200 million666 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown106 Watt
Texture fill rate51.8412.43
Floating-point performance3,462 gflops497.3 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 980M and Radeon HD 3870 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR4
Maximum RAM amount8 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz2252 MHz
Memory bandwidth160 GB/s72.06 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI+no data
G-SYNC support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+no data
GeForce ShadowPlay+no data
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+no data
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+no data
Optimus+no data
BatteryBoost+no data
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.53.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 980M 19.03
+1222%
ATI HD 3870 1.44

GeForce GTX 980M outperforms Radeon HD 3870 by 1222% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 980M 7349
+1224%
ATI HD 3870 555

GeForce GTX 980M outperforms Radeon HD 3870 by 1224% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p173
+1342%
12−14
−1342%
Full HD74
+1380%
5−6
−1380%
1440p31
+1450%
2−3
−1450%
4K28
+1300%
2−3
−1300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 350−400
+1067%
30−33
−1067%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 650−700
+1175%
51
−1175%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 400−450
+1150%
30−35
−1150%
Battlefield 5 850−900
+1169%
67
−1169%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 500−550
+1182%
35−40
−1182%
Cyberpunk 2077 350−400
+1067%
30−33
−1067%
Far Cry 5 800−850
+1190%
62
−1190%
Far Cry New Dawn 750−800
+1171%
59
−1171%
Forza Horizon 4 950−1000
+1184%
74
−1184%
Hitman 3 450−500
+1116%
35−40
−1116%
Horizon Zero Dawn 950−1000
+1167%
75−80
−1167%
Metro Exodus 850−900
+1208%
65
−1208%
Red Dead Redemption 2 650−700
+1150%
50−55
−1150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 800−850
+1190%
60−65
−1190%
Watch Dogs: Legion 750−800
+1193%
55−60
−1193%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 550−600
+1150%
44
−1150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 400−450
+1150%
30−35
−1150%
Battlefield 5 750−800
+1216%
57
−1216%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 500−550
+1182%
35−40
−1182%
Cyberpunk 2077 350−400
+1067%
30−33
−1067%
Far Cry 5 650−700
+1150%
52
−1150%
Far Cry New Dawn 600−650
+1177%
47
−1177%
Forza Horizon 4 2500−2550
+1209%
191
−1209%
Hitman 3 450−500
+1116%
35−40
−1116%
Horizon Zero Dawn 950−1000
+1167%
75−80
−1167%
Metro Exodus 700−750
+1173%
55
−1173%
Red Dead Redemption 2 650−700
+1150%
50−55
−1150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 800−850
+1190%
60−65
−1190%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 800−850
+1211%
61
−1211%
Watch Dogs: Legion 750−800
+1193%
55−60
−1193%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 300−310
+1054%
26
−1054%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 400−450
+1150%
30−35
−1150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 500−550
+1182%
35−40
−1182%
Cyberpunk 2077 350−400
+1067%
30−33
−1067%
Far Cry 5 500−550
+1216%
38
−1216%
Forza Horizon 4 600−650
+1177%
47
−1177%
Horizon Zero Dawn 950−1000
+1167%
75−80
−1167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 800−850
+1190%
60−65
−1190%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 400−450
+1112%
33
−1112%
Watch Dogs: Legion 750−800
+1193%
55−60
−1193%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 650−700
+1150%
50−55
−1150%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 400−450
+1112%
33
−1112%
Far Cry New Dawn 450−500
+1186%
35
−1186%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 260−270
+1200%
20
−1200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 220−230
+1194%
16−18
−1194%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 300−310
+1150%
24−27
−1150%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+1173%
10−12
−1173%
Far Cry 5 400−450
+1076%
34
−1076%
Forza Horizon 4 500−550
+1182%
39
−1182%
Hitman 3 290−300
+1218%
21−24
−1218%
Horizon Zero Dawn 500−550
+1182%
35−40
−1182%
Metro Exodus 500−550
+1216%
38
−1216%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 500−550
+1216%
35−40
−1216%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 290−300
+1218%
21−24
−1218%
Watch Dogs: Legion 170−180
+1208%
12−14
−1208%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 400−450
+1190%
30−35
−1190%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 210−220
+1213%
16
−1213%
Far Cry New Dawn 220−230
+1194%
17
−1194%
Hitman 3 180−190
+1186%
14−16
−1186%
Horizon Zero Dawn 270−280
+1186%
21−24
−1186%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150−160
+1150%
12
−1150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 290−300
+1218%
22
−1218%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 150−160
+1150%
12
−1150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
+1200%
10−11
−1200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 130−140
+1200%
10−11
−1200%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+1150%
4−5
−1150%
Far Cry 5 150−160
+1150%
12
−1150%
Forza Horizon 4 300−310
+1054%
26
−1054%
Horizon Zero Dawn 270−280
+1186%
21−24
−1186%
Metro Exodus 260−270
+1200%
20
−1200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−105
+1150%
8−9
−1150%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 220−230
+1194%
16−18
−1194%

This is how GTX 980M and ATI HD 3870 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 980M is 1342% faster in 900p
  • GTX 980M is 1380% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 980M is 1450% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 980M is 1300% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.03 1.44
Recency 7 October 2014 19 November 2007
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm

The GeForce GTX 980M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 3870 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 980M is a notebook card while Radeon HD 3870 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
GeForce GTX 980M
ATI Radeon HD 3870
Radeon HD 3870

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 319 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 158 votes

Rate Radeon HD 3870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.