RTX A4000 vs GeForce GTX 980M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 980M SLI with RTX A4000, including specs and performance data.

GTX 980M SLI
2014
2x 8 GB GDDR5, 200 Watt
23.85

RTX A4000 outperforms GTX 980M SLI by an impressive 94% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking24882
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.0425.07
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameno dataGA104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date7 October 2014 (10 years ago)12 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30726144
Core clock speed1038 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speed1127 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors2x 5200 Million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt140 Watt
Texture fill rateno data299.5
Floating-point processing powerno data19.17 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width2x 256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed5000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA+8.6
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p135
−92.6%
260−270
+92.6%
Full HD110
−90.9%
210−220
+90.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 140−150
−92.9%
270−280
+92.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−88.7%
100−105
+88.7%
Sons of the Forest 50−55
−92.3%
100−105
+92.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
−87.5%
180−190
+87.5%
Counter-Strike 2 140−150
−92.9%
270−280
+92.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−88.7%
100−105
+88.7%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−89.9%
150−160
+89.9%
Fortnite 120−130
−91.7%
230−240
+91.7%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
−85.6%
180−190
+85.6%
Forza Horizon 5 75−80
−81.8%
140−150
+81.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
−87.5%
180−190
+87.5%
Sons of the Forest 50−55
−92.3%
100−105
+92.3%
Valorant 160−170
−79.6%
300−310
+79.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
−87.5%
180−190
+87.5%
Counter-Strike 2 140−150
−92.9%
270−280
+92.9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
−75.1%
450−500
+75.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−88.7%
100−105
+88.7%
Dota 2 120−130
−87%
230−240
+87%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−89.9%
150−160
+89.9%
Fortnite 120−130
−91.7%
230−240
+91.7%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
−85.6%
180−190
+85.6%
Forza Horizon 5 75−80
−81.8%
140−150
+81.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 85−90
−93.2%
170−180
+93.2%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−85.2%
100−105
+85.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
−87.5%
180−190
+87.5%
Sons of the Forest 50−55
−92.3%
100−105
+92.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
−91.8%
140−150
+91.8%
Valorant 160−170
−79.6%
300−310
+79.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
−87.5%
180−190
+87.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−88.7%
100−105
+88.7%
Dota 2 120−130
−87%
230−240
+87%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−89.9%
150−160
+89.9%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
−85.6%
180−190
+85.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
−87.5%
180−190
+87.5%
Sons of the Forest 50−55
−92.3%
100−105
+92.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
−91.8%
140−150
+91.8%
Valorant 160−170
−79.6%
300−310
+79.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 120−130
−91.7%
230−240
+91.7%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
−88.7%
100−105
+88.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
−73.4%
300−310
+73.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
−93.2%
85−90
+93.2%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−81.8%
60−65
+81.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−71.4%
300−310
+71.4%
Valorant 200−210
−70.7%
350−400
+70.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
−91.2%
130−140
+91.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−87.5%
45−50
+87.5%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−78.6%
100−105
+78.6%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−90.5%
120−130
+90.5%
Sons of the Forest 30−35
−91.2%
65−70
+91.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−87.5%
75−80
+87.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
−86.4%
110−120
+86.4%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−87.5%
45−50
+87.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
−84.8%
85−90
+84.8%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−90.5%
40−45
+90.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−89.2%
70−75
+89.2%
Valorant 140−150
−88.8%
270−280
+88.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−84.2%
70−75
+84.2%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−87.5%
45−50
+87.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−90.9%
21−24
+90.9%
Dota 2 80−85
−87.5%
150−160
+87.5%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−89.7%
55−60
+89.7%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−86%
80−85
+86%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−92.3%
50−55
+92.3%
Sons of the Forest 18−20
−84.2%
35−40
+84.2%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
−85.2%
50−55
+85.2%

This is how GTX 980M SLI and RTX A4000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A4000 is 93% faster in 900p
  • RTX A4000 is 91% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.85 46.31
Recency 7 October 2014 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 140 Watt

RTX A4000 has a 94.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 42.9% lower power consumption.

The RTX A4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 980M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 980M SLI is a notebook graphics card while RTX A4000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M SLI
GeForce GTX 980M SLI
NVIDIA RTX A4000
RTX A4000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 56 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 695 votes

Rate RTX A4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 980M SLI or RTX A4000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.