Quadro P2200 vs GeForce GTX 980 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 980 Mobile with Quadro P2200, including specs and performance data.

GTX 980 Mobile
2015
4 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
21.33

P2200 outperforms GTX 980 Mobile by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking260236
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation19.85no data
Power efficiency7.4422.34
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGM204GP106
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date21 September 2015 (9 years ago)10 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$395.82 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481280
Core clock speed1064 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1216 MHz1493 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100-200 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate136.2119.4
Floating-point processing power4.358 TFLOPS3.822 TFLOPS
ROPs6440
TMUs12880

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data201 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount4 GB5 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s1251 MHz
Memory bandwidth224 GB/s200.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.24x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support+-
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
BatteryBoost+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA+6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD97
−3.1%
100−110
+3.1%
4K48
−4.2%
50−55
+4.2%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.08no data
4K8.25no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
−2.6%
40−45
+2.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−4.7%
45−50
+4.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
−10.3%
75−80
+10.3%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
−2.6%
40−45
+2.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−4.7%
45−50
+4.7%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−8.7%
100−105
+8.7%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
−5.3%
60−65
+5.3%
Metro Exodus 55−60
−12.1%
65−70
+12.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−12.2%
55−60
+12.2%
Valorant 85−90
−9.2%
95−100
+9.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
−10.3%
75−80
+10.3%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
−2.6%
40−45
+2.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−4.7%
45−50
+4.7%
Dota 2 56
−7.1%
60−65
+7.1%
Far Cry 5 70−75
−7.1%
75−80
+7.1%
Fortnite 110−120
−7.1%
120−130
+7.1%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−8.7%
100−105
+8.7%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
−5.3%
60−65
+5.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 84
−7.1%
90−95
+7.1%
Metro Exodus 55−60
−12.1%
65−70
+12.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
−5.6%
150−160
+5.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−12.2%
55−60
+12.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 81
−11.1%
90−95
+11.1%
Valorant 85−90
−9.2%
95−100
+9.2%
World of Tanks 240−250
−12%
270−280
+12%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
−10.3%
75−80
+10.3%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
−2.6%
40−45
+2.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−4.7%
45−50
+4.7%
Dota 2 75−80
−11.8%
85−90
+11.8%
Far Cry 5 70−75
−7.1%
75−80
+7.1%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−8.7%
100−105
+8.7%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
−5.3%
60−65
+5.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
−5.6%
150−160
+5.6%
Valorant 85−90
−9.2%
95−100
+9.2%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−9.8%
190−200
+9.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
World of Tanks 140−150
−10.3%
160−170
+10.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−2.3%
45−50
+2.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−8.3%
65−70
+8.3%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−7.1%
60−65
+7.1%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−12.2%
55−60
+12.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Valorant 55−60
−5.3%
60−65
+5.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Dota 2 60
−8.3%
65−70
+8.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 60
−8.3%
65−70
+8.3%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−7.7%
70−75
+7.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
−8.3%
65−70
+8.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
−8.1%
40−45
+8.1%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Fortnite 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−6.1%
35−40
+6.1%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Valorant 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%

This is how GTX 980 Mobile and Quadro P2200 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P2200 is 3% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P2200 is 4% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.33 24.03
Recency 21 September 2015 10 June 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 5 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 75 Watt

Quadro P2200 has a 12.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 25% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P2200 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 980 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 980 Mobile is a notebook card while Quadro P2200 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Mobile
GeForce GTX 980 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro P2200
Quadro P2200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 81 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 980 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 378 votes

Rate Quadro P2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.